This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Δδ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Blocked after first comments. Δδ (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Editing from Δδ has been disabled by Moreschi for the following reason(s): "spa" Δδ (talk) 21:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're kidding, right? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

No kidding.Δδ (talk) 21:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's because evading a block is, in and of itself, grounds for a block. As is having a username similar to that of another user (User:Δ). —Jeremy (v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!) 21:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Δδ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Blocked after my first comments

Decline reason:

Your block will not be lifted until you retract the legal threat you made below, per our policy. TNXMan 14:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict) Declining unblock on the sole reason of WP:NLT, par the legal threat below. Also, i note that the talk page is virtually never visited. The chance that someone uninvolved with 91.155.234.89 would make a user account and drop right into this discussion is virtually zero - thus WP:SPA and WP:SOCK / WP:MEAT Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 14:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)}}Reply

Reason for blocking: "Editing from Δδ has been disabled by Moreschi for the following reason(s): "spa" "

The article [1] has been put together to make the subject look like a nutcase. There's a gross character assassination going on here [2] and here [3]. Those who try to edit the article or take part in the discussion, are banned by default by Wikipedia users AndyTheGrump, Dipa1965, LuckyLouie, Moreschi and Dougweller. A semi-protection was put on both the article and the discussion page in order not to allow anyone to stop the character assassination. User 91.155.234.89 is blocked as well, despite that he already contacted Wikimedia.org. If no intervention follows my request to solve this matter, it will eventually be dealt with through criminal prosecution.Δδ (talk) 14:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not obligated to allow you to post defamatory screeds, and the fact that you started editing in the exact same manner and the exact same places as 91.155.234.89 immediately following its block suggests very strongly that you are indeed 91.155.234.89, and thus you are evading your block. As blocks/bans are of the person and not the account, that means this account has been indefinitely blocked (and likely would have been anyway due to the username) and the one-month block on your IP reset. Also, so long as the legal threat stands, you will not be allowed to edit. —Jeremy (v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!) 18:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Δδ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Blocked after first comments Δδ (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As long as the above legal threat stands, you will not be unblocked par WP:NLT. More unblock requests will not change that. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 14:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reason for blocking: "Editing from Δδ has been disabled by Moreschi for the following reason(s): "spa" "

The article [4] has been put together to make the subject look like a nutcase. There's a gross character assassination going on here [5] and here [6]. Those who try to edit the article or take part in the discussion, are banned by default by Wikipedia users AndyTheGrump, Dipa1965, LuckyLouie, Moreschi and Dougweller. A semi-protection was put on both the article and the discussion page in order not to allow anyone to stop the character assassination. User 91.155.234.89 is blocked as well, despite that he already contacted Wikimedia.org. If no intervention follows my request to resolve this matter, there will be consequences. The consequences depend entirely upon your actions. Δδ (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Banned edit

Per this discussion, you are subject to a community ban from Wikipedia. I have enacted it accordingly. As of now, you are forbidden to edit Wikipedia under any account or IP whatsoever. You may appeal to either the community or the Arbitration Committee, though you are advised to follow the standard offer first. --Dylan620 (tc) 02:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply