stewart

edit

Hi - please stop attempting to add death claims without a wp:rs - please click on that link and read and understand - continued insertion attempts will result in my requesting you blocked - thanks Govindaharihari (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I second this. If you persist in trying to add false death claims to Stewart's page, someone will have to lock the page, and your account may be suspended. Jwslubbock (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rod Stewart. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Govindaharihari (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@User talk:Govindaharihari Sorry! People keep telling me that he has died. I can be quite sensitive. $upernerd1 (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

i m spooky

edit

If this draft does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.


Please read and understand - I am going to report you if you continue. Govindaharihari (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:$upernerd1/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:$upernerd1/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Govindaharihari (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Draft:I.M.Spooky. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Draft:I.M.Spooky, you may be blocked from editing. Stanley Appleford (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Draft:I.M.Spooky. Stanley Appleford (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply