Viroguy

T-even bacteriophage structure

A transmission electron microscope image of S-PM2, a T4-type bacteriophage of Synechococcus

Introduction to Virus Ecology and Evolution
Virus Adaptation to Environmental Change
Phage Therapy

Thin section electron microscopic image of a Megavirus particle.

Electron micrograph of podovirus ΦCP7R.

Transmission electron microscopy of negatively stained C3 morphotype podovirus SU10.

Ultra-thin section electron microscopy of SU10. Phage empty capsids and progeny in the bacterial cytoplasm forming a honeycomb shape structure are evident.

Scanning electron microscopy image of SU10 adsorbed onto the surface of bacteria.

policy re: bioRxiv citations and image use

Hello. Is there a wikipedia policy about citing bioRxiv articles? Also, there are images in bioRxiv articles that I would like to upload. On bioRxiv they have cc by 4.0 license. I suspect, but do not know for certain, that the eventual published version will be copyrighted. Is it OK to use those sorts of images even after they appear in a copyrighted publication? For example, figure 2 A and B panels of http://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/05/17/139097.full.pdf would be excellent addtions to an article I'm interested in. Thank you. Viroguy (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

   Hi Viroguy. Yes, bioRxiv articles are used in citations. There is even a template at {{cite bioRxiv}}. There are many cases however where a citation to an unpublished article is not appropriate. As far as images in the article are concerned, once they have been released under a license the release cannot be taken back no matter where else they are published. You would need to include the citation to the article when you upload the image. That documents the licensing as well as crediting the creators. StarryGrandma (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
   With rare exceptions, everything is copyrighted from the moment it's created. Creative Commons and other licences give permission to use a the copyrighted work. It's still copyrighted. If it is republished without changes, you can keep using it under Creative Commons regardless of what terms are offered (or not offered) on the new version. If it's published with modifications, you can keep using the Creative Commons version, but you would need to check what (if any) license was available before copying the new version. Alsee (talk) 09:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

       Thank you both!!!!Viroguy (talk) 02:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Cryo-EM of a Marseilleviridae virus particle reveals a large internal microassembly Kenta Okamoto, Naoyuki Miyazaki, Hemanth K.N. Reddy, Max F. Hantke, Filipe R.N.C. Maia, Daniel S.D. Larsson, Chantal Abergel, Jean-Michel Claverie, Janos Hajdu, Kazuyoshi Murata, and Martin Svenda (17 May 2017). "Cryo-EM of a Marseilleviridae virus particle reveals a large internal microassembly". bioRxiv 10.1101/139097.{{cite bioRxiv}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)