User:Veroonikka99/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes the lead sentence introduces the Barghawatas and states who they were
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the lead introduces the topic of geography and history in relation to the Barghawatas
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no it does not
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? the lead is concise and gives a quick overview which is further discussed in detail in the article

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes the content gives history and a background story of the tribe
Is the content up-to-date? yes the most recent edit on the article was august 9th 2019
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Is the article neutral? yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? not much information present on the kings.
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? no
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? not enough sources used for the history section of the article.
Are the sources current? No they are over 10 years old
Check a few links. Do they work? 3 f them do not work and most of them are links to other wikipedia articles.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes it is clear
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? only one image but it relates to the topic
Are images well-captioned?yes
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? no

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? wikipedia goes very into detail

What is the article's overall status? its okay but could use work
What are the article's strengths? easy to read and follow
How can the article be improved? more sources
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? underdeveloped

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~