User:Veggies/Sandbox

lol

GasBuddy was started in June 2000 by Dustin Coupal and Jason Toews from the Minneapolis-St. Paul area in Minnesota. As of July 2007, it has over 180 websites for regions in North America, including all fifty states of the United States the District of Columbia, ten Canadian provinces, and most metropolitan areas in both countries. With an active cadre of 150,000 to 200,000 contributors, thousands of prices are reported daily, making available a large collection of near real-time pricing data for virtually all of North America. GasBuddy has also implemented a text messaging and WAP site to allow users to get prices on the go. GasBuddy has an interesting feature that shows gas prices on a "temperature map" so it is easy to spot the highest and lowest gas prices in the nation.
MapQuest Gas Prices Same prices as found on MSN but has mapping features. Prices are delayed when compared to prices listed on GasBuddy
Flying J (gasoline/auto diesel/propane)
Flying J (diesel/biodiesel/farm diesel)
Gas Price Watch
MSN Gas Prices
FuelMeUp.com (Provides gas price info on over 86,000 stations nationwide. Gas and Diesel)
Gasticker.com - Canada's Gasoline Price Tracker
UCAN (San Diego, California only)

Sites Similar to (But Not Affiliated to) GasBuddy.com:

[1] 2

Counter

User:Swatjester/lolcats

STOP!

This article is biased!

We consider all allegations of bias and slanted POV seriously. The editors of this article, however, need specific examples from reliable sources to be able to take measures to correct any problems. Placing templates such as {{POV}} or {{Disputed}} within the article without mentioning specific, reliable reasons for such will result in the swift reversion of these additions as unsubstantiated claims.

You can't use the word "terrorist" or "terrorism" to describe the attackers or their attacks.

Wikipedia:Words to avoid states very clearly in the beginning that "there is no word that should never be used in a Wikipedia article". That being said, "terrorism" is a word that requires special attention when used in Wikipedia. The major contributors have arrived at the consensus, after several lengthy debates, that it is appropriate to use the term in a limited fashion to describe the attacks and the executors of these attacks. The contributors have arrived at this conclusion after looking at the overwhelming majority of reliable sources that use this term as well as the United Nations' own condemnation of the attacks.[2]

Hello, I confirm that I’d like to usurp de:User:Veggies -- Veggies (talk) 23:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Veggies/Sandbox

Images Deleted edit