User:Vdeba001/Pura Vida Bracelets/Sandraventurelli Peer Review

Peer review

edit

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

edit

Lead

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, the lead talks about the points expanded in the content of the article
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The article only have a an about section but it is briefly described in the lead section
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all the information in the lead is in the article body
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead in concise

Lead evaluation

edit

Content

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes the content is relevant to the main topic
  • Is the content added up-to-date? Yes it is
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think there is missing information when it comes to the actual business but overall the about section does cover a great amount of information about the Pura Vida Bracelets

Content evaluation

edit

Tone and Balance

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added neutral? Yes it is
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, all information is neutral
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
  • Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? I don't think so, The content is about the story of the company, how it was created and what they have achieved

Tone and balance evaluation

edit

Sources and References

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Mostly all content is backed up. In the lead I found the statistic about the bracelets and it's donations to charity and it was not backed up with a source directly.
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they are good sources
  • Are the sources current? Yes
  • Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they do work

Sources and references evaluation

edit

Organization

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the content is concise and it is easy to read
  • Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not see any grammatical errors
  • Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? For this article there is only one section, about section, and I do think that section reflect what an about section should be about the company.

Organization evaluation

edit

Images and Media

edit

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, there are no pictures
  • Are images well-captioned? No images present
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images present
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images present

Images and media evaluation

edit

For New Articles Only

edit

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

  • Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, the article does meet the Wikipedia notability requirements
  • How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list of sources is not as long and it does represent a good literature about the topic.
  • Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? I believe that this article represent the pattern that Wikipedia articles have since it have a lead and the next section is about. I think that if the article were expanded it would follow the patterns of other Wikipedia articles
  • Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, it have links to other articles

New Article Evaluation

edit

Overall impressions

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I believe it is a new article. The article did have quality infomartion about the business represented
  • What are the strengths of the content added? I think that one of the greatest parts about the article is that it has a story that makes the reader want to keep reading and find more information about the Pura Vide Bracelets
  • How can the content added be improved? It think more content about the charities that the business contributes to would be a great addition to the article

Overall evaluation

edit