User:Ughhwhatevertay/Sarah Rachel Russell/Awwillia Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
editOveral, your article about Sarah Rachel Russell is excellent and really insightful about her life, history, and all other components. Learning about Russell's major impact has been very informative, and I appreciate the thorough detail you gave in your post. But I have to make a helpful comment about the text's excessive length. Although the amount of information is undoubtedly helpful in comprehending Russell's past, the article reads more like an essay than a Wikipedia article. Without compromising the complexity of the material, comprehension might be improved by simplifying the text and emphasizing the presentation of important topics. However, it is clear that you took great care to provide all relevant information, so readers would be able to fully understand Russell's historical significance.