Tsommer23

Looking at the articles Siamese Cat and Bicolor Cat.

Bicolor Cat:

The history on the talk page is filled with both bold and small edits. Some remove images of cats entirely as they don't hold up to wikipedia's image standards and looks very homemade. A lot of people try to put their own cat pictures on the article. Many people discuss the amount of images on the wikipedia page. Because cats are adorable, sometimes people added too many images and it created an even balance between text and images. There is also a discussion started about the redirect on the page. Some of the comments on the talk page are not informational or representative of an edit and people are just talking about their cats. It proves how much of a lovable subject this is!

There have been a couple external links that have been edited or modified. I also think some references and facts should be cross referenced to ensure they are accurate, especially in claims of genealogy.

Siamese Cat:

There have been edits made around the difference in using UK English versus US English as it was not uniform. Facts should be cross checked as the talk page is full of people saying different breeds descending from siamese are either incorrect or need to be added. A bold edit was replacing the. description of one of the cat photos as it was mislabeled. There is unsupported language used when describing the cats nose as perfect, which is subjective and not factual.

-I think a good edit could be using a uniform word of Siamese cat instead of just siamese or cat.