| ||
I'm all that's left of the East-German freedom movement in the late '80s. 
No seriously, I'm working here on topics like Open Source and Human rights.
If you have any problems or questions about what I've done here, don't hasitate and talk to me at my german talk page, that I read much more often than this one.
My opinion about bot's edits in articles edit
Have you ever received such on your talk page?
July 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mandalorian, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mandalorian was changed by Trac3R (u) (t) deleting 11465 characters on 2010-07-02T16:18:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
In my case, I've been removing fiction and in-universe-pov, which is really unwanted around here, so I thought. So I reported this as false positive, as recommended, and what happened? The report has been archived like every report on that page, ignored by the bot owner. Am I the only one having a problem with this behavior? Obviously not. But that does no good, as well, since the ClueBot Talk page also seems to be ignored. So it's rather likely impossible to pursue our own policy. Removing fiction is not wanted in here. Welcome to wookieepedia!
I thought Wikipedia was about user generated content. But I guess it is about bot generated content now. Also the removal of strong language is so typical puritanical US-american. English is lingua franca mostly all over the world, but stupid Evangelicalism is not so wide spread! Contributors should watch and take care of their articles themselfes, and not bots. Fraking (you don't get me on this one!) bots have no business in articles.