Revert |
Time Date |
Reason
|
1 |
17:55, 26 April 2011 |
"Capacity: revert to text that was the product of a wide collaborative effort over many days and strip out POV-pushing"
|
2 |
11:20, 27 April 2011 |
"Without consensus"
|
3 |
11:37, 27 April 2011 |
"Capacity: Tom94022, you’ve been warned twice today about editing against consensus. I suggest you get buy-in from Diego today before you really run afoul"
|
4 |
12:15, 27 April 2011 |
"Capacity measurements: Diego did his very best at compromise. Please seek his buy-in on the talk page before deleting material. I agree with Diego’s edits for the most part here."
|
5 |
14:44, 2 May 2011 |
"Not even grammatically correct. And the proper approach here given the huge consensus and all that has transpired, is for the dissenting voice to *discuss* first, not after the fact"
|
6 |
14:38, 22 May 2011 |
"(Restored to last unbiased version by I.P. 193.210.145.13. Clear POV-pushing in ‘Capacity’ section undone) (undo) "
|
7 |
21:05, 22 May 2011 |
"Tom94022 may not edit against consensus"
|
8 |
01:51, 25 May 2011 |
"Capacity: Too much utter nonsense with citations that said no such thing. Reverted"
|
9 |
Example |
Example
|