My criteria for voting Support for an admin are as follows

  1. This is the only one that must be fulfilled Over 3000 edits
  2. Have some sort of personality, I see alot of Admins who are about as interesting as concrete, just because you are an Admin on Wikipedia doesn't mean you need to become a rigid bore.
  3. Have engaged in a dispute. Preferably a large one, the only way you can appreaciate a dispute where dirt is being slung, and resolve it, is to have slung some yourself
  4. Preferably not a self nom, but confidence in a self nom will help
  5. If you are a personilty-less candidate but you've done something I like that will also help get you the vote

For me to vote Support, No. 1 must be fulfilled, along with any, all or some of No.'s 2, 3, 4, 5.

The criteria are subject to change, there may occasional exceptions

This is an offical †he Bread policy