User:Talgalili/sandbox/Closed testing procedure

In statistics, the closed testing procedure[1] is a general method for controlling the experimentwise or multiple type I error rate when multiple hypothesis have to be tested ,i.e. when performing more than one hypothesis test simultaneously.

The intrinsic feature of the closed testing procedure is to refer a set of hypotheses which are closed under intersection, and that each test is of level α. The procedure controls the familywise error rate for all k hypotheses at level α in the strong sense.

Theoretical background - the problem of multiple testing

edit

The contest with testing simultaneously several hypotheses differs from the concept of dealing with only one hypothesis. In single hypothesis, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true, the probability of rejecting it is less or equal level α. There is a need for a similar concept also for handling multiple hypotheses, because if we will apply individual tests at a given level α, then, under the assumption that all null hypothesis are simultaneously true - the probability of falsely rejecting one of them would exceed the given level α. For example, If all tests are independent, the probability would be   where   is the number of hypotheses.at some point, this probability would be equal to 1.

One of the first general methods of alpha adjustment for multiple comparisons early has been the Bonferroni correction. That means that for testing k hypotheses, the single tests should be performed at the level α/k.

The closed testing principle

edit

Let   be a random variable with distribution  . Let   be a set of null hypotheses closed under intersection:   implies  . For each   let   be a level α test (i.e.the overall type I error rate is α). Any null hypothesis   is tested by means of   if and only if all hypotheses   that are included in   and belonging to   have been tested and rejected. In other words, every single hypothesis of this set is tested using valid local level α tests. Hypothesis is only rejected if its test is significant and the tests of all single hypotheses which are subsets of it is significant.

Proposition: The closed testing principle controls the familywise error rate for all the   hypotheses at level α in the strong sense.That is, The probability of making no type I error is at least 1-α.

Proof: If we denote by   the event that at least one true   is rejected, and by   the event that one true hypothesis is rejected. In order for the closure procedure to reject (the correct)  , all hypothesis implying it should be rejected, and in particular the hypothesis in the event  . That means,  .

 

The procedure

edit

  Test every member of the closed family by a α-level test.

  Reject a basic hypothesis if its corresponding α-level test rejects it, and every intersection hypothesis that includes it is also rejected by its α-level (see examples). [2]

Examples

edit

Suppose there are three hypotheses H1,H2, and H3 are to be tested and the overall type I error rate is 0.05. Then H1 can be rejected at level α if H1H2H3, H1H2, H1H3 and H1 can all be rejected using valid tests with level 0.05.


Now, suppose there are four hypotheses H1,H2,H3 and H4 and we use pairwise problem. The resulting closed set of hypotheses includes those single hypotheses:

H1H2H3H4,

H1H2H3, H1H2H4, H1H3H4, H2H3H4, H1,2H3,4, H1,4H2,3, H1,3H2,4,

H1H2, H1H3, H1H4, H2H3, H2H4, H3H4.

In the closed test procedure, everyone of those single hypothesis is tested at level α. The hypothesis is rejected only if its test is significant and the tests of all single hypothesis which are subsets of it. That is the reason why the closed test procedure keeps the multiple level α.


For example, the hypothesis H2H4 is only rejected if all the tests for the hypothesis H1H2H3H4, H1H2H4, H2H3H4, H1,3H2,4 and H2H4 are significant.


In the sketch from the right side it is possible to see the hierarchy of the procedure. The single hypothesis are tested in the order of the hierarchy, starting with the hypothesis on the highest level (H1H2H3H4 in our case). If this single hypotheses is significant, the hypothesis below will be tested (marked with a red arrow). Otherwise it will be not be tested and regarded as non significant. A single hypothesis will be only tested if all its super-sets one level above are significant. [3]

Special cases

edit

The Holm–Bonferroni method is a special case of a closed test procedure for which each intersection null hypothesis is tested using the simple Bonferroni test. As such, it controls the familywise error rate for all the k hypotheses at level α in the strong sense. Additional special case is Hochberg's step-up procedure(1988) which has the same constant as for Holm–Bonferroni method but the direction is opposite, affecting the stopping location, and as a result Hochberg's method more powerful than Holm–Bonferroni. However, while Hochberg’s is based on the Simes test (1987) and thus holds only under independence (and also under some forms of positive dependence), Holm’s is based on Bonferroni with no restriction on the joint distribution of the test statistics.

Multiple test procedures developed using the graphical approach for constructing and illustrating multiple test procedures[4] are a subclass of closed testing procedures.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Marcus, R; Peritz, E; Gabriel, KR (1976). "On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance". Biometrika. 63: 655–660. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.655.
  2. ^ Westfall, Peter,H.; Tobias, Randal,D.; Wolfinger, Russell,D. (2011). "Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using SAS": 344–352. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |http://books.google.co.il/books?id= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Banken, L.; Burger, H.U; Kristiansen, S.; Pasquier, M. "The closed test procedure" (PDF): 502–513. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |1= and |2= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Bretz, F; Maurer, W; Brannath, W; Posch, M (2009). "A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures". Stat Med. 28 (4): 586–604. doi:10.1002/sim.3495.

Category:Hypothesis testing Category:Statistical tests Category:Multiple comparisons