United States v. Knox[1] was a case in the Third Circuit court of appeals blah blah blah.

references

edit
  1. ^ United States v. Knox, 977 F.2d 815, 817 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. granted, 113 S. Ct. 2926, vacated and remanded, 114 S. Ct. 375 (1993), aff'd, 32 F.3d 733 (3d Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 1994 WL 512613 (U.S. Jan. 17, 1995).

sources

edit
  • ABA article: [1]
  • National Review article: [4]
  • "Confession of Error by the Solicitor General". Michigan Law Review. 74 (5): 1067–1083. April 1976.</ref>
  • Annemarie J. Mazzone, United States v. Knox: Protecting Children from .Sexual Exploitation Through the Federal Child Pornography Laws, [5]
  • 3 J. App. Prac. & Process 509 (2001) When the President Says No: A Few Thoughts on Executive Power and the Tradition of Solicitor General Independence; Days, Drew S. III [6], [7] [8]
  • Things to google:
92-1183 knox
  • cases:
    • United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Crim. No. 91-00074), 776 F. Supp. 174, 180 (M.D. Pa. 1991).  : copy needed
    • Original Third Circuit, United States v. Knox, 977 F.2d 815 (3d Cir. 1992): copy needed
    • SG brief to SCOTUS: copy needed
    • SCOTUS remand order, Knox v. United States, no.92-1183, vacated and remanded, 508 U. S. 959, 114 S. Ct. 375 (1993): [9]
    • Third Circuit on remand, 32 F.3d 733 (3d Cir. 1994): [10]
    • SCOTUS denial of second cert. copy needed