The link is here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A%E2%88%B4A%E2%88%B4 If you look at the history over the last year or so there have been no links allowed by the editors. This is a consensus issue and you can take it up on the talk page again if you like. They are problematic in numerous ways and at this point it would be senseless to just let them accrete. If you want links, and not just your personal preference, you should compose an authoritative (backed up by secondary sources) list and submit it for scrutiny. Is the link you provided referenced by any other independent source? If not it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standard of scrutiny. Love is the law, love under will.
How exactly are this links problematic? - Svetlonos
You don't provide a reliable secondary source citation. And by the way Stealthepiscopalian is respected Wikipedia editor. Removing something that has been deemed a violation of both Wikipedia policy and consensus is not "vandalizing." Please tone down your ad hominem attacks and read the Wikipedia guidelines for contributors. Adding what I can only assume is your own personal lineage is itself a rank violation of Wikipedia policy because it promoting special and/or self interest. ~ChoronzonClub~