User:Soni/sandbox4

Initiation procedure

Which of these conditions should be sufficient to compel an administrator to run an RRfA? Support more than one option if needed.

• Option A: 25 EC editors sign a request within the last 1 month OR 50 EC editors within the last year (same as proposal 16C)
• Option B: 25 EC editors sign a request within the last 1 month
• Option C: 50 EC editors sign a request within the last 1 month
• Option D: 40 EC editors sign a request within 10 days. Requests can be opened but are not rolling
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (Initiation procedure)

...

Discussion (Initiation procedure)

...

Reconfirmation threshold

What percentages of support are necessary for an administrator to pass a reconfirmation RfA?

• Option A: 66.6% for a pass, 55% and above is at bureaucrat discretion (same as proposal 16C)
• Option B: 75% for a pass, 65% and above is at bureaucrat discretion (same as RfA)
• Option C: 60% for a pass, 50% and above is at bureaucrat discretion
• Option D: 55% for a pass, 45% and above is at bureaucrat discretion
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (reconfirmation threshold)

...

Discussion (reconfirmation threshold)

...

Eligibility to RRFA

When is an RRFA request not allowed for an admin?

• Option A: For 12 months after an admin successfully runs for an RFA, RFB, RRFA, or Arbcom elections (same as proposal 16C)
• Option B: For 12 months after an admin successfully runs for an RFB, RRFA, Arbcom elections
• Option C: (In case of non rolling requests) For 6 months after any failed RRFA requests
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (Eligibility to RRFA)

...

Discussion (Eligibility to RRFA)

...

RRFA Suffrage

When can eligible editors vote for an RRFA requests?

• Option A: No limits
• Option B: If they've not supported an RRFA request for the same admin in the last 2 years
• Option C: If they've supported less than 5 currently open RRFA requests
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (RRFA Suffrage)

...

Discussion (RRFA Suffrage)

...

Removing signatures

Under what circumstance can a vote on an RRFA request be removed?

• Option A: If a CheckUser confirms an editor as a possible sock
• Option B: If an uninvolved admin determines the editor as disruptive
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (Removing signatures)

...

Discussion (Removing signatures)

...

Desysop after RRFA request

After a successful RRFA request, when should an admin be desysopped?

• Option A : If an admin does not start an RRFA within 30 days of a successful RRFA request, within a bureaucrat's discretion (same as proposal 16C)
• Option B : If an admin does not start an RRFA within 10 days of a successful RRFA request
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (Desysop after RRFA request)

...

Discussion (Desysop after RRFA request)

...

RRFA Request discussion

Should votes in a RRFA request be limited to signatures? Can they have discussion?

• Option A : Reasoning can be added to an RRFA request, but no further discussion
• Option B : Only signatures can be added to an RRFA discussion. No reasoning or discussion
• Option C : Signatures and one link can be added. No reasoning or discussion
• Something else (specify...)

Survey (RRFA Request discussion)

...

Discussion (RRFA Request discussion)

...

Finer Points

If there's any implementation details not already covered by the previous sections, please add them here.

Reconfirmation by admin elections

Can an admin stand for reconfirmation via Administrator Elections?