I think it's possible to b somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan in the sense of the clarity that Jefferson (the actual writer of the effing declaration of Independence! "We hold these truths to be self evident; that all men [generic term from an earlier age] were created equal") understood the spirit of the Constitution ("a government of, for, and by, the people") than Hamilton, by a long shot; / remember; Lincoln was a Republican, /Kennedy made it QUITE clear, he wasn't duped by communist ideology, but I NEVER hear ultrarights a) (frankly) admit they might ever b wrong about any god-damned thing @ all, or b) especially, the fact that (I'd guess) looses them the most voters; namely; that these god-damned corporations get more/more obnoxious all the god-damned time! A fact I highly doubt, unknown by; well; any1; really. Any1 who doesn't, @ least mention such, occasionally; is entering a religion called United Corporate Whores. That is not among my practices!
I think it's possible to b somewhere to the left of Carl Marx in the sense that we can/should end the state of affairs I just mentioned.
However I gotta tell ya; I've rarely seen anything as batsh*t as the bill of goods the left is currently trying to sell us! That state of affairs, should ALSO end!
The group pic I intend for this group is that of a blue baby elephant, /a pink baby donkey (both in diapers) fighting/crying "waaa waaa; you hurt me!" (Both). Unless someone is willing to provide me with that; I'll have to wait till January, when I got $. Eventually I'd like a brief cartoon in which 1st they fight; then they cry; then BOTH their parents, put the 1 of the opposite sex in the corner. The donkey eventually says from the corner, clearly knowing it's supposed to be a silent separation sit (to the elephant) ..."but we never talk; anymore!" (Finish).
1 thing I think most agree on, is that the supreme Court usually acts w/a clearly mature eye towards justice, whether said people (most) admit it or not, and counterintuitive as it may come off, I think I may b 1 of them, even though my proposal is that we eliminate 1 of their duties; deciding what is or isn't a Monopoly. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there's a REALLY GOOD reason why what a Monopoly really means really is an important area of vast philosophical importance; but I'd want that, @ least explained in terms of "how we livin'" (M.C. Hammer-Cant Touch This); because; otherwise; to quote Aleister Crowley, I'm of the opinion that I see "two asses" that should be "set to grind 🌽".
Any Discordians, / others of such ilk, want to play a 1st degree game of Sink?