User:Savannahmaria/Education for refugees, migrants and internally displaced persons/HannahLH Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Savannahmaria
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Savannahmaria/Education_for_refugees,_migrants_and_internally_displaced_persons?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Education for refugees, migrants and internally displaced persons
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Hi Savannah! Your article is SUPER good! Feel free to email me if you have any questions about what I wrote. Here's my peer review:
- I think your use of the quote in your first paragraph in "Background" is great!
- Maybe your second paragraph in "Comprehensive Needs" could use a citation?
- In the last sentence of your intro paragraph for "Educational improvements" it's not clear who "they" are. Is it everyone in the survey? Just the 15% who reported being illiterate? Maybe you could add something after "least likely" like "least likely out of..." or just say who.
- Overall, you nailed the encyclopedic voice! All info is delivered in an unbiased and concise way. Awesome job!
- I also appreciated how you separated comprehensive and academic needs!
- Super duper AWESOME job this is fab!