Article Review edit
Special Olympics (Week 2)
User:Codystgermain/sandbox User:Morris116084/sandbox
1: Everything was relevant to my topic
2: No the article does not seem neutral in some cases. Some of it is written like an advertisement. Also, there are aspects of it that seem promotional.
3: The symbols section seems to be the viewpoint or information that is underrepesented the most.
4: After checking sources (6) and (21), the information lined up with the citation and was easy to navigate.
5: The article has a criticism section. However, this section only has one article written by K Stoney, More information should be added to this section with other viewpoints of criticism from other reliable sources.
6: Most information is extremely up to date. There is a reference from 2007 and 2004 though
7: Each fact was referenced with an appropriate and reliable reference.
8: Most of the sources seem reliable; however, there seems to be quite a bit of press material within the page.
9: Not sure how to get to the talk page of the article.
(Week 3)
{{
notes edit
{{reflist}}
 | This is a user sandbox of SBerenyi4. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |