User:Rhsimard/Templates/Cite court new/sandbox

This is the sandbox page for User:Rhsimard/Templates/Cite court new (diff).

Documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Based on information from the article Case citation.

Usage edit

Copy a blank version to use. All fields must be lowercase. At this point, all fields are optional; however, this is subject to change as the template matures.

Horizontal list

{{cite court |litigants= |presiding= |vol= |reporter= |opinion= |pinpoint= |court= |date= |url= |quote=}}

Vertical list

{{cite court
|litigants=
|presiding=
|vol=
|reporter=
|opinion=
|pinpoint=
|court=
|date=
|url=
|quote=
}}

Examples edit

{{User:Rhsimard/Templates/Cite court new |litigants=Parker v. D.C. |vol=478 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=370 |pinpoint=401 |court=D.C. Cir. |date=2007 |url=http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200703/04-7041a.pdf |quote=As such, we hold it unconstitutional.}}
Parker v. D.C., 478 F.3d 370, 401 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (“As such, we hold it unconstitutional.”). Text

{{User:Rhsimard/Templates/Cite court new |litigants=Righthaven LLC vs. Democratic Underground LLC|date=2011-06=14 |presiding=Roger L. Hunt, Chief United States District Judge|court=United States District Court, District of Nevada|url=https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/righthaven_v_dem/order6-14-11.pdf|quote=Making this failure more egregious, not only did Righthaven fail to identify Stephens Media as an interested party in this suit, the Court believes that Righthaven failed to disclose Stephens Media as an interested party in any of its approximately 200 cases filed in thiŝ District.}}
Righthaven LLC vs. Democratic Underground LLC, Roger L. Hunt, Chief United States District Judge (United States District Court, District of Nevada 2011-06=14) (“Making this failure more egregious, not only did Righthaven fail to identify Stephens Media as an interested party in this suit, the Court believes that Righthaven failed to disclose Stephens Media as an interested party in any of its approximately 200 cases filed in thiŝ District.”). Text

Description of fields edit

All fields are optional!

litigants: List of litigants, such as "Miranda v. Arizona". If a Wikipedia article using this exact string exists, a link will automatically be created. Alternately, if an article exists but another name is desired for display, a wikilink may be specified; i.e., "[[Case article|This v. That]]". Note: This should likely not be optional.
presiding: The judge or authority issuing the ruling.
vol: Volume of the reporter.
reporter: The abbreviated term for whatever reporter is being referenced; i.e., "U.S." for the U.S. Supreme Court's "United States Reports".
opinion: The opinion number, often the page number for the case.
pinpoint: Identifies a specific part of a decision, typically by page or paragraph number.
court: The court being cited, such as "3d Cir." or "M.D. Ala." In order for court to appear, date must be specified. Note: This field also should likely not be optional.
date: The year or date in which the court rendered its decision.
url: A web site or other online article with information on the case. For example, for a U.S. Supreme Court case, the URL to FindLaw is http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol={{{vol}}}&page={{{page}}}

Cite court

The above documentation is transcluded from User:Rhsimard/Templates/Cite court new/doc.
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox and testcases pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this page.

This is the template sandbox page for User:Rhsimard/Templates/Cite court new (diff).