User:Ra5en/Cao Yu/Reuentahl404 Peer Review

Peer review

edit

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

edit
  • Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)Ra5en
  • Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ra5en/Cao Yu

Lead

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's concise enough to me

Lead evaluation

edit

Content

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
  • Is the content added up-to-date? yes
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
  • Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes

Content evaluation

edit

Tone and Balance

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added neutral? yes
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
  • Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation

edit

Sources and References

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
  • Are the sources current? yes
  • Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? no
  • Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Sources and references evaluation

edit

Organization

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
  • Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
  • Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I think it need to add a few sections

Organization evaluation

edit

Images and Media

edit

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
  • Are images well-captioned? see the first question
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? see the first question
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? see the first question

Images and media evaluation

edit

For New Articles Only

edit

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

  • Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
  • How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
  • Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
  • Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation

edit

Overall impressions

edit

Guiding questions:

  • Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
  • What are the strengths of the content added? it adds more details which can help readers to understand better
  • How can the content added be improved? I'll write in the overall evaluation

Overall evaluation

edit

Hi, I really like your introduction so far. It is very detailed and to me as you have well-introduced Cao Yu and given a really clear impression of Cao Yu himself. I also think you have done pretty well in such a short paragraph as I think you have already given all the necessary information. However, I do have two suggestions, first of all you may try to add the Chinese version (characters) of Cao Yu's name in this paragraph which would give a much clearer impression for the readers. Secondly, I think maybe this paragraph can be further shortened, as I have though a way like, you can take the part of the influence of western literature to Cao Yu's work out of this paragraph and create a new part to further introduce the influence. Since you've also mentioned Eugene O'Neill's works' influence to his work, I think trying to introduce more about this topic would be fairly interesting but it also need more work as well. Overall, great job!