User:Purplesquire/Herpesviral meningitis/RwdSimpson Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Purplesquire
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Purplesquire/Herpesviral_meningitis?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Herpesviral meningitis - Wikipedia
Evaluate the drafted changes
editOverall, a noticeable improvement over the original article. Changing the opening paragraph to a more general overview of the topic and then moving into the specifics like diagnoses and treatments in the subsections gives the article a more natural flow.
There seems to be good, solid sources for the key points of information brought up in the article. And anytime another topic is brought up you link to its page, which is helpful.
I don't know how feasible this is for your topic, but if you could find information to help flesh out the existing subsections, I feel like that would be the best way to further improve this article.