User:Psychologylearner1/Ecopsychology/Leanna321 Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Psychologylearner1
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Psychologylearner1/Ecopsychology
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Ecopsychology
Evaluate the drafted changes
editI think you have already made some very valuable contributions to the article by adding a section about indigenous perspectives and how they relate to the topic. I would suggest moving the section about indigenous perspectives on ecopsychology and TEK to the history section as a subcategory, just because I think these ideas fit well into the “Origins of ecopsychology” section. If you do move it to the history section, I also think it would work best at the very beginning of the section, since the indigenous ideas have probably been around a lot longer than any of the other ideas that are talked about in the history section. Having this section earlier would also give context for information in the Roszak section which references those ideas later on. I would also suggest adding more description about which indigenous peoples had these ideas, or, if these are ideas from almost all indigenous peoples, specifying that it was indigenous populations around the world. I also noticed that there were a lot of places in the original article that were marked as needing a citation, so that could be another area to improve if you have time.