![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
User: Psun23/Dandelion Coffee
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Psun23/Dandelion_coffee&oldid=1002114101
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dandelion_coffee&oldid=1000754368
Evaluate the drafted changes
editLead
editWhen comparing the recently published article on January 16th to the current revision by Psun23, it appears there has been little to no updates to the lead to represent what will be included in the article. However, the existing lead is concise and what the term Dandelion 'coffee' means. Although the lead is concise, I believe that there could be more revisions to be done to introduce what the article will include.
Content
editAs mentioned above, the article has little to no revisions from the most recent revision by user Monkbot to the sandbox draft for Psun23.
Tone and Balance
editN/A
Sources and References
editN/A
Organization
editN/A
Images and Media
editN/A
New Article
editN/A
Overall Impression
editI found after reading the article and comparing the current version to the draft I am reviewing, there can be significant additions to the article. A few questions I had after finishing the article: Can you expand on the preparation and research section? How long does the preparation process last? As of 2021, is there any new research done in the correlation between cancer treatment and dandelion coffee (maybe add graphs of recent studies, if any)?