This user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was last edited by BrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs) 2 years ago. (Update timer) |
Maximal functions appear in many forms in harmonic analysis (an area of mathematics). One of the most important of these is the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function. They play an important role in understanding, for example, the differentiability properties of functions, singular integrals and partial differential equations. They often provide a deeper and more simplified approach to understanding problems in these areas than other methods.
The Hardy-Littlewood maximal function
editG.H. Hardy was the first to consider maximal functions in the hope of better understanding cricket scores. Given a function defined on the uncentred Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of is defined as
at each . Here, the supremum is taken over balls in which contain the point and denotes the measure of (in this case a multiple of the radius of the ball raised to the power ). One can also study the centred maximal function, where the supremum is taken just over balls which are have centre . In practice there is little difference between the two.
Basic properties
editThe following statements[1] are central to the utility of the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator.
(a) For ( ), is finite almost everywhere.
(b) If , then there exists a such that, for all ,
(c) If ( ), then and
where depends only on and .
Properties (b) is called a weak-type bound and (c) says the operator is bounded on . Property (b) can be proved using the Vitali covering lemma. Property (c) is clearly true when , since we cannot take an average of a bounded function and obtain a value larger than the largest value of the function. Property (c) for all other values of can then be deduced from these two facts by an interpolation argument.
It is worth noting (c) does not hold for . This can be easily proved by calculating , where is the characteristic function of the unit ball centred at the origin.
Applications
editThe Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator appears in many places but some of its most notable uses are in the proofs of the Lebesgue differentiation theorem and Fatou's theorem and in the theory of singular integral operators.
Non-tangential maximal functions
editThe non-tangential maximal function takes a function defined on the upper-half plane and produces a function defined on via the expression
Obverse that for a fixed , the set is a cone in with vertex at and axis perpendicular to the boundary of . Thus, the non-tangential maximal operator simply takes the supremum of the function over a cone with vertex at the boundary of .
Approximations of the identity
editOne particularly important form of functions in which study of the non-tangential maximal function is important is is formed from an approximation to the identity. That is, we fix an integrable smooth function on such that and set
for . Then define
One can show[1] that
and consequently obtain that converges to in for all . Such a result can be used to show that the harmonic extension of an function to the upper-half plane converges non-tangentially to that function. More general results can be obtained where the Laplacian is replaced by an elliptic operator via similar techniques.
The sharp maximal function
editFor a locally integrable function on , the sharp maximal function is defined as
for each , where the supremum is taken over all balls .[2]
The sharp function can be used to obtain a point-wise inequality regarding singular integrals. Suppose we have an operator which is bounded on , so we have
for all smooth and compactly supported . Suppose also that we can realise as convolution against a kernel in the sense that, whenever and are smooth and have disjoint support
Finally we assume a size and smoothness condition on the kernel :
when . Then for a fixed , we have
for all .[1]
References
edit- L. Grafakos, Classical and Modern Fourier Analysis, Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey, 2004
- E.M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis, Princeton University Press, 1993
- E.M. Stein & G. Weiss, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton University Press, 1971
Notes
edit- ^ a b c Stein, Elias (1993). "Harmonic Analysis". Princeton University Press.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Grakakos, Loukas (2004). "7". Classical and Modern Fourier Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)