Ok, here she is!
Sooooo, what now. Philc TECI 21:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, here's a editcount report for you, correct as of 19 August 2006: [1] --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 12:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Also, we should all go through Phil's contribs, and list what each of us feels are Phil's strenghts and weaknesses. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 12:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah! --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 04:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Editcount edit
Interiot's Tool 1 and the edit summary tool have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off; please do not use them. Preferably, use Interiot's Tool 2 or Flcelloguy's Tool
Username Philc 0780 Total edits 3892 Distinct pages edited 744 Average edits/page 5.231 First edit 04:07, 26 February 2006 (main) 1539 Talk 290 User 574 User talk 333 Image 16 Template 84 Template talk 3 Category 7 Category talk 2 Wikipedia 913 Wikipedia talk 122 Portal 9
Last updated: 12:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Editcount report: (as of 19 August 2006) [2]
Strengths edit
Phil edit
Sam edit
Shreshth edit
Weaknesses edit
Phil edit
- Since joining the project edits have become more foccused on the Ref Desk, and menial random additions to random articles, due to noticing things while surfing. Philc TECI 17:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- When people are undeniably ignorant, arrogant, or stubborn, I tend to tell them what I think of them, which usually ends up violating WP:CIVIL. Philc TECI 19:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, yes it does, and that sort of thing can be disastrous in an RfA. Personally, when I can't write anything without compromising whatever my point is with incivility, I go off and play N or something for a while. By the time I come back, either I've calmed down and gathered my thoughts, or I've realised that it wasn't very important in the first place. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- (I did like your point about "blof" having as many Ghits as "decelerate" though. I've no idea why such an obviously useless test of notability still has so much currency.) --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a quite stuborn myself, though, not really arrogant or ignorant, but this does means I tend to flair up quite easily in conflicts... I know I shouldn't and I'll try not too. I too dont know why something that has 167M hits for porn, and 7M hits for cure for aids can be used to test notability. Philc TECI 18:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)