Peer review
editThis is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing? Paco BRG
- Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Paco BRG/Bocage
Lead
editGuiding questions:
There is no lead. Probably in the original article already
editContent
editGuiding questions:
- The content is relevant .
Content evaluation
editTone and Balance
editGuiding questions:
- Content is from a neutral perspective.
Tone and balance evaluation
editSources and References
editGuiding questions:
- There are no sources as of yet.
Sources and references evaluation
editOrganization
editGuiding questions:
- content is mostly in bullet format currently. But ideas are in a coherent sequence.
Organization evaluation
editImages and Media
editGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
editFor New Articles Only
editIf the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
New Article Evaluation
editOverall impressions
editGuiding questions
overall, I think there are some very interesting ideas you plan on adding to the article. Just maybe some sources for clarity would be helpful.