Statement of the dispute
editThis is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.
Description
edit{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}
- NBGPWS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Fairness And Accuracy For All (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Evidence of disputed behavior
edit(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
- [1] [2] [3] [4]
- NBGPWS decided to spam a noticeboard that he did not agree with, adding material obviously not in line with the conspiracy theory angle of the noticeboard. He began adding an article on homosexual acts repeatedly as noted above. He was blocked for the behaviour by Luna Santin [5] who cited 3RR violation, disruption and WP:POINT violation. User has since admitted to violating WP:POINT [6] I and others regarded this incident as vandalism.
- [1] [2] [3] [4]
- "deletionists" / "deletionist hit squad" - [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
- "Wiki Stalinists" - [12]
- "Moron" - [13]
- "WHAT???? If you think THAT'S an attack, You need more (or less) Byron!" - [14]
- "There is NO justification to remove the numerous reviews! Acting out in bitterness over the disasterous election results, huh?" - [17]
- "Back to the 'Conspiracy Theories'! What's with you guys? Thank g_d you have your own club!" - [18]
- "Wiki RepubliCon Cabal" & "FREEPER SCUM DEATH MERCHANTS !" - [19]
- Note this dif is provided below for proof of AGF as well.
- [20] "so the Wiki RepubliCon Cabal who deleted his entry SOLELY because it reflected VERY badly on the (mostly) Conservatives bloggers, Freepers and Scamdy Posters"
Disruption / Threats
edit- [21] "You'll be hearing a LOT more about what some feel is your intentional misuse of BLP, beatty. A LOT more."
- Comment repeated [22]
- [23] "As much as your OWN behavior and justification for it helped you LAST TIME, huh? LOL!"
- [24] "If I desire your feedback, I'll post to YOUR user page!"
- [26] "Nuclear, you CAN'T just post your comments at the top, the page goes in time order, repost them where they belong, at or near the bottom of the page. You know better than that! ANI nex time you do it"
- [27] "You're currently on probation for the exact sort of behavior you're exhibiting here, and did on the Votergate talk page, as well. You might consider changing that behavior before you get banned"
- This is in response to the below WP:C violation when I asked the user for proof the producers released the movie for download on YouTube.
- [21] "You'll be hearing a LOT more about what some feel is your intentional misuse of BLP, beatty. A LOT more."
Spamming
edit- [31] " I just discovered you were Zer0Faults too! Zer0faults has abandoned that account and opened a new account"
Other
edit- Accusations:
- [35] - "HD was NOT produced by HBO. One must question why nuclear insists on repeatedly inserting false info into the article"
- Note: at no point did I ever write it was.
- Vote stacking:
- Accusations:
Applicable policies and guidelines
edit{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
edit(provide diffs and links)
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
edit{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}