User:NoraLeblanc/Florence Knoll/Beatricebertrand123 Peer Review

Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
Is the content added up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
What are the strengths of the content added?
How can the content added be improved?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of "Homemaking"
Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Additional Resources

Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Davytian Armine

KimleeGalak

Nikitadaigle

Qetsia

Link to draft you're reviewing
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:KimleeGalak/Florence_Knoll
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Knoll

Evaluate the drafted changes

Introduction:

La section d'introduction est très bonne, mais je crois qu'on retrouve trop d'information qui devrait peut-être être replacé ailleurs dans l'article puisqu'elle me semble tout de même pertinente. Cette section devrait être plus courte pour simplement donner un avant-goût au lecteur. Il faudrait aussi rajouter une section qui énonce les sujets principaux de l'article.

Contenu:

Pour ce qui est du contenu présent, l'information semble très bien. Dans la partie introductive, il y a beaucoup d'information sur sa carrière. Question de réduire cette section comme jai mentionné plus haut, vous pourriez créer une nouvelle catégorie qui présenterait justement sa carrière en détail.

Sources et références:

Pour ce qui est des sources, on en retrouve seulement qu'une. Il serait bien d'en trouver d'autres pour diversifier l'origine du contenu retrouvé dans l'article. Par contre, la source choisie semble être de qualité. Pour ce qui est des références, il faudrait les ajouter au travers le texte pour comprendre exactement de où provient l'information.

Organisation:

L'article est bien écrit et se lit très facilement. Puisque vous semblez avoir beaucoup d'information, je rajouterais peut-être d'autres grandes sections ainsi que des sous-catégories pour ne pas trop mettre d'informations dans une seule section. Cela permettra au lecteur de garder goût à la lecture de l'article. Par exemple, la section "Les premières années" pourrait être divisé en deux. Une section qui parle de sa biographie (début de vie) et l'autre qui focus plus sur ses études puisque vous en parler beaucoup.

Images et média:

Pour l'instant il n'y a pas d'images, mais dans le Sandbox c'est bien d'avoir énoncé ce que vous alliez ajouter à l'article (dont plusieurs images).

Impression générale:

De manière générale, l'article me semble très pertinent. C'était une bonne idée de mettre en point vos idées au début de l'article. Vous semblez avoir beaucoup d'information que vous souhaitez rajouter, je ferais attention de ne pas trop en mettre et de prioriser l'information pertinente. Malgré que l'article reste encore incomplet, on peut bien comprendre la direction dans laquelle vous allez.

Bonne continuité!