Very interesting to note Wiki' arrogance by some of the more seasoned contributors. Whilst admitting my first major 'edit' was 'poorly written', I was so pleased at its CONTENT that I over-looked the error. But Lozleader should note not only a history of major spelling-errors, but also, by insinuating ONLY that my edit was 'poorly written', the objectivity was lost because many previous edits were not only badly written, they also contained exclamation marks. Some mistake surely? Objectivity being the hallmark of this esteemed site, it appears that a working knowledge of how to use Wikipedia allows users to disguise their own subjectivity through hubris.