NGUYEN MINH HAI
Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)
Low to moderate level of vandalism
[view • purge • update]
2.90 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 23:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Search user languages |
- Welcome to Natl1's User Page
- Natl1's talk page-User talk:Natl1
- Natl1's contributions-Special:Contributions/Natl1
- User warning tool- User:Adam1213/warn
- Natl1's Status- User:Natl1/Status
- For media copyright questions see WP:MCQ
- I am Natl1 on Commons
- "Wannabe Kate" Edit Counter
- Welcome to Natl1's User Page
It greatly distresses me every time I see an RFA like this one. We are deciding whether or not we trust [a user] to not misuse three buttons. That's it. This isn't a review of his articles, or lack thereof. This isn't a critique of how he spends his time on Wikipedia. There is one and only one question - can we trust that he would not misuse the admin buttons. Nobody has given a reason not to trust him. "He doesn't write enough articles" isn't a reason. An RFA is more analagous to "Requests for janitorship" than it is "Request for editor-in-chiefship". I would strongly encourage those who comment on this RFA and future ones like it to seriously consider that we have a severe shortage of active admins and it does nothing to help Wikipedia when we exclude hard workers from adminship.--BigDT
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
