User:NatalieBullis/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

edit

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

  • Name of article: Law
  • Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I believe that Law itself is very interesting, important to know about and follow.

Lead

edit
Guiding questions
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes its very clear
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the whole article is about Law
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it clearly tells what Law is.
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? A little over detailed

Lead evaluation

edit

Content

edit
Guiding questions
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the article's content relevant to the topic
  • Is the content up-to-date? Yes, the content up-to-date
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, I do think it is a little over detailed

Content evaluation

edit

Tone and Balance

edit
Guiding questions
  • Is the article neutral? Yes, it shows the good side of Law and why we need it and use it in our everyday lives.
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
  • Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation

edit

Sources and References

edit
Guiding questions
  • Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes it gives a long detailed History paragraph
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • Are the sources current?
  • Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the vocabulary links work for each word.

Sources and references evaluation

edit

Organization

edit
Guiding questions
  • Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Its not easy to read its very detailed
  • Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No grammar issues
  • Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, gives the history and legal theory and much more.

Organization evaluation

edit

Images and Media

edit
Guiding questions
  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The images look old.
  • Are images well-captioned? Yes
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, could be bigger

Images and media evaluation

edit

Checking the talk page

edit
Guiding questions
  • What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
  • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
  • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Yes

Talk page evaluation

edit

Overall impressions

edit
Guiding questions
  • What is the article's overall status? Gives an over view of what Law is.
  • What are the article's strengths? Very well written with many examples, and links to the vocabulary terms
  • How can the article be improved? I think the article could be shorten where it has the History of Law
  • How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article well-developed.

Overall evaluation

edit

Optional activity

edit
  • Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

  • Link to feedback: