Wikipedia

User:Megalibrarygirl/Wikipedia and public libraries

< User:Megalibrarygirl

Wikipedia and libraries work well together in many different ways. As librarians, we work to provide access to information and make information more available to people who need or want it. Wikipedia provides a platform that allows information to be shared and updated as new information takes its place. Librarians can help make Wikipedia more accurate, improve citations and references. In turn, adding items to Wikipedia can provide additional discovery points to library collections. Librarians are in a unique place to make rare and "hidden" information more visible and accessible through Wikipedia to more users online.

Verify

edit

All articles on Wikipedia must contain information that is verifiable. Wikipedia editors work to ensure that information in the online encyclopedia is sourced by reliable and independent sources. After the famous study in Nature comparing Wikipedia to the Encyclopedia Britannica and finding similar amounts of accuracy,[1] Wikipedia editors worked for four months to correct any errors that were found during the study.[2] Other studies have similarly found low amounts of error on Wikipedia.[3] This is largely due to the use of reliable information that makes up the sourcing for articles.

Articles that are not properly sourced are likely to be deleted.

Sources at YOUR library

edit

As librarians, we are surrounded by information. Some of it is unique to our own collections. We're in a position to add information that may otherwise go unnoticed to Wikipedia. We can use our special collections to provide information on topics on Wikipedia. Sometimes, our libraries may have the only copy of a book that can help provide citations for articles. While working on an article for the Woman's Club of El Paso, I was able to reference a book, The Woman's Club of El Paso: It's First Thirty Years (1978), in my library's collection that is not digitized and not available at most libraries. All of us have similar books that can help improve articles on Wikipedia.

Archivists often have specialized knowledge of their collections that can be useful in improving articles relating to objects in the collections.[4]

In addition, as librarians, many of us have access to databases. Let's put that to good use!

Sources from TWL

edit

The Wikipedia Library (TWL) provides Wikipedia editors access to database accounts with 51 publishers in several different languages.[5] These publishers include JSTOR, Oxford University Press, Project MUSE, Gale and Elsevier.[5]

Make accessible

edit

Information that is made available online is 4.5 times more likely to be cited than information that is only available in print form.[6] Researchers using Wikipedia are able to trace additional information from the citations added to Wikipedia by following the reference links at the bottom of articles.[7] Wikipedia is the eighth-largest referrer of digital object identifiers (DOI), according to Crossref in 2015.[8][9] Crossref developed a Wikimedia Ambassador program to help integrate more scholarly publications in Wikipedia articles.[10]

It is important to meet those who are searching for information where they are already looking for it. Users looking for information are already using Google and Wikipedia for their searches.[11] According to a 2018 Library Journal survey, 83% of students start their research using Google, while 57% use library databases and 28% use Wikipedia alone.[12] Wikipedia itself receives over 500 million visits per month.[5] Results from searches on Google turn up Wikipedia sites most often on the first page.[13] Wikipedia, through The Wikipedia Library (TWL), also works with the Internet Archive and OCLC to ensure that links to information cited on Wikipedia is easy to find and remains accessible.[13]

Information uploaded to Wikimedia Commons helps to make collections more accessible by providing content with open licensing that allows the content to be reused, remixed and repurposed.[4]

Make visible

edit

Information visibility

edit

For Information to be made visible online, it has to be made available online first.[6] After that, the information can be made discoverable in different ways.[6] In this essay, I'm naturally focusing on discoverability involving Wikipedia.

Information that is cited on Wikipedia from databases becomes visible in Google searches: even if it's behind a paywall. Some sources, like Newspapers.com, allow users to "clip" out information. These clippings can be viewed by anyone, making information that was once hidden, now fully accessible.[14] Oxford has experimented with opening up access to information behind paywalls. They gave free access to the Dictionary of Islam and worked with editors to include references on Wikipedia. The department that provided the access, the Oxford Islamic Studies Center found a significant increase to their own site referred by Wikipedia after adding the information from the Dictionary of Islam to relevant pages on Wikipedia.[11] Similarly, Loyola University Chicago sees Wikipedia as one of their top drivers of external traffic to their digital collections.[2]

Collection visibility

edit

"Special collections are for use."[15]

Information from your collection can become more visible if becomes part of Wikipedia. A study that followed an effort to increase visibility of digital archival assets at the Ball State University Archives found that when links to a particular collection were added to relevant articles, that there was a significant increase in pageviews of their digital assets.[16] Linda Quirk, a librarian at a rare book library at the University of Alberta, has also noticed that after increased visibility of digital copies of collections has led to a "renewed interest in studying the original print documents not just in the humanities but in the sciences as well."[17]

For archivists, partnering with Wikipedia can help promote their collections and also to make them more available to more people.[4]

Fight bias

edit

Despite all attempts to maintain neutrality, Wikipedia, like the humans that build it has a bias.[2] More Wikipedia editors are men (91%) and most editors live in the Global North.[2] Coverage on topics that are typically associated with women or feminine traits are not covered as well as other topics on Wikipedia.[18] Wikipedia, like many institutions, is reflecting the dominant part of culture's point of view.[2] Libraries and librarians can help address bias on Wikipedia by contributing information from their collections that centers minority experiences and viewpoints.[2]

Visibility is important in fighting bias. In my own experience in working with women's biographies, I find that many notable women are "hidden" in databases. They are not covered by mainstream media, but they were covered by reliable sources that are difficult to access. Google searches won't turn up much information on them. However, using databases and archives, you can find a lot of information on notable women from the past. Once that information is written into Wikipedia, a Google search will turn up that woman's biography. A person hidden from history becomes visible once more.

Get involved

edit

Librarians are in a unique position to help students, patrons and researchers to identify reliable, independent sources that Wikipedia needs.

GLAM

edit

GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) is a program that partners these institutions with Wikipedia. The GLAM page on Wikipedia has a ton of resources and examples of successful collaborations between Wikipedia and institutions.

Visiting Scholar program

edit

Visiting Scholars partner with The Wikipedia Library (TWL) to work with research libraries and university libraries. This program allows the visiting scholar access to the library's collections and materials to help improve articles which link back to the library.[19]

Wikipedian in Residence

edit

Your library or institution could host a Wikipedian in Residence. A Wikipedian in Residence partners a Wikipedia editor with a library or museum collection to improve Wikipedia articles on topics relating to the institution.[20] The Wikipedian in Residence helps to share information from the institution and make it easily accessible to more people.[21] Other Wikipedians in Residence help librarians and others at the institution become comfortable with editing Wikipedia.[22]

#1Lib1Ref

edit

The campaign, #1Lib1Ref, takes place every year for a few weeks around the anniversary of the founding of Wikipedia.[23] The project encourages librarians to replace "citation needed" tags with valid references.[23]

Use "Citation Hunt" to find sections of Wikipedia pages that need citations.

Host an edit-a-thon

edit

Edit-a-thons allow experienced editors to teach new users how to edit Wikipedia.[23] Edit-a-thons can be broad in scope or focused on a particular topic.[23]

A librarian in Kansas City, Missouri, Kim Gile, noticed that there was a lack of coverage of the city's notable jazz scene on Wikipedia. In order to fix the problem, she invited a Wikipedian in Residence, Monika Sengul-Jones, to help host an edit-a-thon to tackle the issue.[24] The library provided information to participants with Gile finding resources that would be considered reliable sources on Wikipedia. Participants learned about resources the library had that they didn't know about and also learned how to evaluate information.[24]

Get involved with Art+Feminism.

Join Wikimedia Library and Library Users Group

edit

Librarians from around the world are members of the Wikimedia Library and Library Users Group. Members are involved in many different areas of librarianship.

Wikipedia literacy

edit

Librarians should understand how to evaluate Wikipedia articles as sources in and of themselves.[23] Merrilee Proffitt, who is a Senior Program Manager at OCLC, describes some basic literacies for evaluating Wikipedia articles. These include the time and date of last update, article quality, and completeness of an article.[23]

Wikipedia passes most of the criteria of the CRAAP test: it is current, relevant and accurate.[2] It's purpose is to spread information freely and is run by a non-profit, so it does well there, too.[2] The only issue with Wikipedia as a source in and of itself is that it is not authoritative.[2] However, Wikipedia does link to authoritative, reliable information through its many citations.

For students

edit

It is also important for librarians to teach students that anyone with or without credentials or authority can edit Wikipedia.[25] This places an emphasis on teaching students how to access the references that are included in Wikipedia.[25] Librarians working with younger students should be aware that Wikipedia entries may be written at a higher reading level than the students who are trying to use the encyclopedia are able to process.[26]

Further reading

edit
  • Proffitt, Merilee (2018). Leveraging Wikipedia: Connecting Communities of Knowledge. American Library Association. ISBN 9780838916322.

References

edit

Citations

edit
  1. ^ Giles, Jim (2005). "Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head". Nature. 438 (7070): 900–901. doi:10.1038/438900a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 16355180. S2CID 4417563.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Phetteplace, Eric (2015-12-16). "Accidental Technologist: How Can Libraries Improve Wikipedia?". Reference & User Services Quarterly. 55 (2): 109. doi:10.5860/rusq.55n2.109. ISSN 1094-9054.
  3. ^ Kräenbring, Jona; Monzon Penza, Tika; Gutmann, Joanna; Muehlich, Susanne; Zolk, Oliver; Wojnowski, Leszek; Maas, Renke; Engelhardt, Stefan; Sarikas, Antonio (2014-09-24). Lovis, Christian (ed.). "Accuracy and Completeness of Drug Information in Wikipedia: A Comparison with Standard Textbooks of Pharmacology". PLOS ONE. 9 (9): e106930. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106930. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4174509. PMID 25250889.
  4. ^ a b c Cooban, George (Autumn 2017). "Should Archivists Edit Wikipedia, and If So How?". Archives & Records. 38 (2): 257–272. doi:10.1080/23257962.2017.1338561. S2CID 64771916 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ a b c Askin, Nicole (September 2016). "Meet The Wikipedia Library...At Your Library". Computers in Libraries. 36 (7): 4–7 – via EBSCOhost.
  6. ^ a b c Adriaanse, Leslie; Rensleigh, Chris (2018). "E-visibility of environmental science researchers at the University of South Africa". South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 83 (2). doi:10.7553/83-2-1636.
  7. ^ Aycock, John (May 2008). "Why I Love/Hate Wikipedia: Reflections upon (Not Quite) Subjugated Knowledges". Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 8: 92–101 – via ERIC.
  8. ^ Wass, Joe (3 March 2015). "Real-time Stream of DOIs being cited in Wikipedia". Crossref. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 2019-02-26.
  9. ^ "DOI Referrals from Wikipedia.org Per Day". Crossref. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 2019-02-26.
  10. ^ Bilder, Geoffrey (7 August 2014). "Citation needed". Crossref. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 2019-02-26.
  11. ^ a b Thornton-Verma, Henrietta (2012). "Reaching the Wikipedia Generation". Library Journal. 137 (7): 32–40 – via EBSCOhost.
  12. ^ Academic Student Ebook Experience Survey 2018. Sponsored by EBSCO Information Services. Library Journal Research. 2018.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  13. ^ a b Albanese, Andrew (15 September 2017). "Discovery Happens Here: PW Talks with Wikipedia's Jake Orlowitz". Publishers Weekly. Archived from the original on 25 September 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  14. ^ Crume, Rick (10 February 2018). "How To Use Genealogy Websites Newspapers.com". Family Tree. Archived from the original on 10 February 2018. Retrieved 2019-02-25.
  15. ^ "Collections Are For Use, but is Wikipedia the Outlet?". Library Journal. 134 (19): 15–16. November 2009 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ Szajewski, Michael (2013). "Using Wikipedia to Enhance the Visibility of Digitized Archival Assets". D-Lib Magazine. 19 (3/4). doi:10.1045/march2013-szajewski. ISSN 1082-9873.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  17. ^ Quirk, Linda (September 2016). "Proliferating Ephemera in Print and Digital Media". English Studies in Canada. 42 (3): 22–24. doi:10.1353/esc.2016.0027. S2CID 164429601 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ Lam, Shyong (Tony) K.; Uduwage, Anuradha; Dong, Zhenhua; Sen, Shilad; Musicant, David R.; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (2011). "WP:clubhouse?: an exploration of Wikipedia's gender imbalance" (PDF). Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration - WikiSym '11. Mountain View, California: ACM Press: 1. doi:10.1145/2038558.2038560. ISBN 9781450309097. S2CID 15730439.
  19. ^ Orlowitz, Jake; Earley, Patrick (March 2014). "Wiki Scholars Visit Libraries". Library Journal. 139 (4): 23 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ Cohen, Noam (2010-06-04). "British Museum Collaborates With Wikipedia". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-04-08.
  21. ^ Bleier, Evan (20 March 2014). "UC Berkeley Has Hired the First 'Wikipedian in Residence' at an American University". UPI Quirks in the News. Retrieved 8 April 2019 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ Doyle, Kelly (November 2018). "What It's Like to Be a Wikipedian in Residence". Information Today. 35 (9): 1–20 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  23. ^ a b c d e f Coreno, Annie (15 June 2018). "ALA 2018 Spotlight: On Wikipedia". Publishers Weekly. Archived from the original on 5 February 2019.
  24. ^ a b Gile, Kim; Sengul-Jones, Monika (November 2018). "Jazzing Up Wikipedia". Computers in Libraries. 38 (9): 22–27 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  25. ^ a b Dollyhigh, Trish (August 2014). "Don't Fight 'Em, Join 'Em! (Just Teach Them How to Do It Better)". Library Media Connection. 33 (1): 32–33 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  26. ^ Fontichiaro, Kristin; Harvey II, Carl A. (November 2010). "How Elementary is Wikipedia?". School Library Monthly. 27 (2): 22–23 – via EBSCOhost. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Megalibrarygirl/Wikipedia_and_public_libraries&oldid=1092266145"