Osmotherapy is defined as the use of osmotically active substances to reduce the volume of intracranial contents. Osmotherapy serves as the primary medical treatment for cerebral edema. The primary goal of osmotherapy is to improve elastance and decrease intracranial volume by removing free water from brain (extra/ intracellular space) into vascular compartment by creating an osmotic gradient between the blood and brain. Normal serum osmolality ranges from 280-290 mOsm/L and serum osmolality to cause water removal without much side effects ranges from 300-320 mOsm/L. Usually, 90 mL of space is created in the intra-cranial vault by 1.6% reduction in brain water content.[1] Osmotherapy has cerebral dehydrating effects.[2] Basic mechanism behind osmotherapy: osmotic agents--> increase serum osmolarity-->shifts fluid from intracellular compartment to intravascular compartment-->Shrinks brain-->decreases ICP. [3] [4]

This shows basic process flow of osmotherapy

History edit

In 1919, Weed and McKibben, biomedical researchers at Johns Hopkins Medical School, were the first ones to document the use and effect of osmotically active ingredients on brain bulk. While studying transfer of salt solutions from blood to Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), they first noted that concentrated sodium chloride intravenous (IV) injection led to collapse of the thecal sac which prevented them from withdrawing CSF from the lumbar cistern. In order to further study the effect, they conducted lab experiments on anesthetized cats which underwent craniotomy. They observed changes to the convexity of cat's brain upon IV injection, specifically, they noted that Hypertonic Saline (HS) IV injection resulted in maximum shrinkage of brain in 15-30 mins, while administration of hypotonic solutions resulted in protrusion and rupture. By 1927, use of osmotic agents in IV delivery became official.[1]

Cerebral Edema edit

 
Cerebral Edema that resulted from brain tumor is represented by darker areas on this CT image

An increase in cerebral water content is called cerebral edema and it usually results from Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subdural hematoma, ischemic stroke, brain tumors, infectious disorders and intracranial surgery. Cerebral edema may result in compromised regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) and intracranial pressure (ICP) gradients which could lead to death of the affected. [1] Increased intracranial pressure leads to increased intracranial volume. Unmonitored ICP leads to brain damage by global hypoxic ischemic injury due to reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure(found by subtracting the ICP from Mean Arterial Pressure) and cerebral blood flow, and mechanical compression of brain tissue due to compartmentalized ICP gradients.[2] Cerebral edema is mainly classified into cytotoxic, vasogenic and interstitial edema. Cytotoxic edema affects both the white and gray matter and results from the swelling of cellular elements such as neurons, glia and endothelal cells. Vasogenic edema affects white matter and results from blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown. Interstitial edema results from lack of proper cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption. [1]

Osmotic Agents edit

Osmotic agents work by primarily affecting the BBB.[1] It's very important that the osmotic agents cannot cross the blood brain barrier because the main idea is to use osmotic agents to increase plasma osmolarity and cause an osmotic gradient to cause water from brain cells to flow into the plasma. Once the equilibrium is reached, both the ICP and intracellular volume return to their initial normal conditions. [3] An ideal osmotic agent would be characterized by its inertness, relative non-toxicity and complete exclusion from brain entry. Thus, osmotic agents with reflection coefficient (σ) closer to 1 (0= freely permeable, 1= completely impermeable) is preferred as it is most likely to exhibit any rebound effects (cerebral edema and ICP elevations) upon withdrawal. Commonly used osmotic agents are urea, glycerol, mannitol and HS.[1] Dosage of osmotic agent administration is referred to as grams per person's body mass (g/ kg).[3]

Urea edit

 
Molecular structure of Urea

Urea with σ=.59 was introduced in 1956 due to low molecular weight, slow peneration of BBB. However, it can cause rebound effects and side effects such as intravascular hemolysis and phlebitis. [1] When Urea is administered, the dosage is 1.5 g/kg or 0.5 g/kg (for elderly).[3]

Glycerol edit

 
Molecular structure of Glycerol

Glycerol with σ=.48 was introduced in 1964, but it has a likelihood of exhibiting rebound effects and causing side effects such as hemolysis, hemoglobinurea, renal failure, hyperosmolar coma and nausea. [1] When Glycerol is used, the dosage is 1.2 g/kg followed by 0.5-1 g/kg for 3-4 hours. [3]

Mannitol edit

 
Molecular structure of Mannitol

Mannitol is a alcohol derivative of simple sugar mannose, has been investigated since 1962. With a σ=.9, molecular weight of 182 daltons, half life of 2-4 hours, ease of preparation, chemical stability and free radical scavenging properties, it's been regarded as the principal osmotic agent for clinical use. However, it could cause diuresis, renal failure, hyperkalemia and hemolysis.[1] If mannitol is used, the dosage used is mannitol 20% solution of 1±1.5 g/kg, followed every 1±6 hours depending on ICP with doses of 0.25±1 g/kg as needed.[2]

HS edit

 
Saline solution prepared for medical use by dissolving NaCl in water

HS with σ=1 has been of interest since early 1980s. HS which contains sodium chloride could work in regulating ICP, intravascular volume and cardiac output without causing significant diuresis, but there are theoretical side effects ranging from neurological complications to subdural hematoma. HS solutions has also been choice of neurocritical care for the past few years. [1] Hypertonic Saline solution used varies and could be 3%, 7.5%, 10%, or 24.3% saline solution.[5] When HS is administered, the dosage is 2 g/kg. [6]

Current Status edit

Osmotherapy is probably the only way to reduce cerebral edema, and hypertonic saline (HS) appears to be better thanother osmotic agents agents.According to some researchers, glycerol can be best administered as a basal treatment whereas mannitol can be administered to control sudden rises in ICP.[7] Compared to mannitol, there's evidence that the improvement in ICP, CBF(cerebral blood flow), and CPP due to administration of HS lasts longer. In addition, HS it also shows significant effect in improving blood rheology such as hematocrit and shear rate at the level of the internal carotid artery (ICA).[6]

Future edit

Resarch studies are going on to find more efficient mechanisms to treat cerebral edema. Combining osmotherapy with other treatment mechanisms has a greater potential to treat cerebral edema more effectively.

RVOT edit

Reductive Ventricular Omotherapy (RVOT) could be a novel treatment that manages cerebral edema without use of osmotic agents. RVOT uses catheters permeable to water vapor to increase osmolarity of CSF. Ex Vivo experiments have been carrued to test the efficiency of RVOT.RVOT is done locally, therefore, it's more likely to be efficient in severe cases of cerebral edema. Sweep gas flows through RVOT cathether made up of hollow fiber to remove free water from ventricles in the form of water vapor. [8]


Second tier Therapies edit

If Osmotherapy using osmotic agents fails in treating cerebral edema, other therapies using Barbituarates and Coricosteroids could be developed. Barbiturates like pentobarbital can act like free radical scavengers as well decrease intracranial blood volume by reducing cerebral metabolic demand. However, administration of barbiturates poses risks such as hypotension, induced coma and infection limiting their potential clinical application.Although corticosteroids are not very effective in treating cerebral edema resulting from ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemmorhage, they are very effective in treating vasogenic edema resulting from brain tumors. Idea behind administration of both barbiturates and corticosteroids is to provide space for cerebral swelling resulting from edema, thus, these are very non specific treating methods. [9]

Novel Targets edit

This research focuses on identifying novel targets that prevents formation of cerebral edema.In order to develop strategies that prevent cerebral edema, it's important understand cerebral edema at a molecular level. Targets identifies includes: NKCC1, SUR1/ TRPM4 channel, Vasopressin Receptor Antagonist. [9]

NKCCl edit

During early and reperfusion stage of ischemia, there is an upregulation of secondary active ao-transporter NKCCl. NKCCl play an important role in modulating loading of sodium and chloride in neurons, glia, endothelial, cells, and choroid plexus epithelial cells. The upregulation of NKCCl is followed by increased deposition of Na and Chloride in endothelial cells and Na+K+ATPase activity plays a role in expelling Na followed by chloride and water from endothelial cells into extracellular space leading to vasogenic edema. Thus, preventing NKCCl upregulation has the potential to prevent cerebral edema from forming. Bumetanide which can be delivered accross the blood brain barrier is an inhibitor of NKCCl.[9] Bumetanide significantly reduces inflamation resulting from TBI.[10] Identifying the right dose of bumetanide that acts as an inhibitor of NKCCl could prevent cerebral edema to some extent. This represents the ATP dependent stage of cerbral edema formation.[9]

SUR1/ TRPM4 edit

There is an upregulation of this nonselective cation channel followed by brain tumor, ischemic injury, and traumatic brain injury. This channel enables the passive transport of water and solute and represents the ATP independent stage of cerebral formation. Opening of these channels result in cellular depolarization and blebbing causing cytotoxic edema. This can be prevented by using glibenclamide which inhibits these channels. [9]

Vasopresin Receptor Antagonist edit

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage(aSAH) results in hyponatremia which leads to water retention and antidiuretic hormone release causing increase in intracranial pressure and formation of cerebral edema. This can be prevented by administartion of conivaptan, a safe FDA approved drug that treats euvolemic hyponatremia. Through the process of aquaresis, conivapten which is a vasopressin receptor antagonist improves serum sodium concentration while eliminating free water without having any negative effect on systolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Since it can decrease cerebral volume and intracranial pressure, it has a potential to treat many forms of cerebral edema.[9] [11]

References edit

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Bhardwaj, A (2007). "Osmotherapy in neurocritical care". Current Neurology and Neuroscience Report. 6 (7): 513–521. doi:10.1007/s11910-007-0079-2. PMID 17999898.
  2. ^ a b c Mayer, Stephan (2002). "Critical Care Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure". J Intensive Care Med. 17 (2): 55–67. doi:10.1177/088506660201700201. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ a b c d e Kalita, J (March 2003). "Current Status of Osmotherapy in Intracerebral Hemorrhage". Neurology India. 51 (1): 104-109. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  4. ^ Hays, Angela (2011). "Osmotherapy: Use Among Neurointensivists". Neuro Critical Care. 14: 222–228. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Qureshi, Al (2012). "Use of hypertonic saline solutions in treatment of cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension". Critical Care Medicine. 28: 3303-3313. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ a b Cottenceau, Vincent (October 2011). "Comparison of Effects of Equiosmolar Doses of Mannitol and Hypertonic Saline on Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism in Traumatic Brain Injury". Journal of Neurotrauma. 28 (10): 2003–2012. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1929. PMID 21787184. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  7. ^ Biestro, A (1997). "Osmotherapy for Increased Intracranial Pressure: Comparison Between Mannitol and Glycerol". Acta Neurochir. 139 (8): 725–733. doi:10.1007/BF01420045. PMID 9309287. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ Odland, R. M. (2011). "The Effect of Reductive Ventricular Osmotherapy on the Osmolarity of Artificial Cerebrospinal Fluid and the Water Content of Cerebral Tissue Ex Vivo". Journal of Neurotrauma. 28 (1): 135–42. doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1282. PMC 3019589. PMID 21121814. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ a b c d e f Walcott, Brian (November 29, 2011). "Novel Treatment Targets for Cerebral Edema". Neurotherapeutics. 9 (1): 65–72. doi:10.1007/s13311-011-0087-4. PMC 3271162. PMID 22125096. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ Lu, K (June 2007). "Bumetanide administration attenuated traumatic brain injury through IL-1 overexpression". Neurol Res. 29 (4): 404–409. doi:10.1179/016164107X204738. PMID 17626737. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  11. ^ Wright, Wendy (August 2009). "Conivaptan for hyponatremia in the neurocritical care unit". Neurocritical Care. 11 (1): 6–13. doi:10.1007/s12028-008-9152-1. PMID 19003543. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

External Links edit

Medscape Osmotherapy