User:Marshfrancis14/David Keightley/Jacob.brown00 Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Marshfrancis14
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
The lead does a great job at explaining what the topic is about, but maybe it would be good to add what the topics that will be discussed later on in the page. I think the body part of the article is well structured with the sections all having a good start. I think the career works and life could be put into more detail. The sources are lined up properly in alphabetical order, but I would add a few more sources because it would help to find new information on your topic.I also think that the variety of sources used so far is very good. Overall I think the article is looking good. I think the strength of this article is the body information. I think the biggest weakness is the lead being a little short and having a limited number of references.