![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Madisonrock18
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Madisonrockw18/Beignet
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Beignet
Evaluate the drafted changes
editOverall Impression
Nice job! I enjoy the changes you made to your article. All the information you added and changed made the article more concise and easier to read. To improve the article further I might consider adding more explanations for the different types of dough, for example 'leavened dough.' Just so readers can gauge the different variations and baking practices involved in making beignets.
Lead
I appreciate the changes you made to the lead! It's much clearer and concise than the current edition of the article.
Content
The content you added is relevant and seems up to date.
Tone and Balance
The tone is neutral and unbiased.
Sources and References
All your sources seem credible; I see that you’ve pulled information from the dictionary and food magazines/websites which all seem credible. The third link didn’t work for me, maybe double check that the reference link is accurate. Everything is linked to a citation which is awesome!
Organization
The organization of the website is great! I appreciate how you made a section for origins of the pastry so the Louisiana section could be more concise.
Images and Media
All the images have captions which is great. I saw that you got rid of the video from the current wikipedia page, curious to know your reasoning behind that.