User:Lollins/Delia Opekokew/Padleyj Peer Review

Peer review

edit

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

edit
  • Whose work are you reviewing? RenelleS, Tashasaleem, Lollins
  • Link to draft you're reviewing: Delia Opekokew

Lead

edit

The lead is concise and clearly describes the topic. There are a couple spelling errors but overall, the introduction is well written, gives a good overview of who Delia is and her achievements.

Lead evaluation 4.5/5

edit

Content

edit

The content added is relevant and up-to-date, gives a thorough description of her early life, education, career and achievements. She's clearly very accomplished!

Content evaluation 5/5

edit

Tone and Balance

edit

The tone used throughout the article is very neutral. It describes Delia Opekokew and her accomplishments very objectively, there is no bias towards any particular position.

Tone and balance evaluation 5/5

edit

Sources and References

edit

All content is backed up and sources accordingly. They are a diverse range of sources and reflect the available literature on the topic. The only thing to be fixed is that the link of the first source cited does not work.

Sources and references evaluation 4.5/5

edit

Organization

edit

The content is concise and clear. One recommendation could be to perhaps break up the "Career" section into two or more paragraphs, which would make this section easier to read. There are a couple spelling errors such as the spelling of "Indigenous" in the introduction section and the use of "too" instead of "to" in the "Early life and education" section. The sections/headings are broken down appropriately.

Organization evaluation 4/5

edit

Images and Media

edit

No images or media at this time.

Overall impressions

edit

Overall, this article is very well written and well-sourced. Besides minor fixes, it's a great article. Well done!