Peer review
editThis is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing? RenelleS, Tashasaleem, Lollins
- Link to draft you're reviewing: Delia Opekokew
Lead
editThe lead is concise and clearly describes the topic. There are a couple spelling errors but overall, the introduction is well written, gives a good overview of who Delia is and her achievements.
Lead evaluation 4.5/5
editContent
editThe content added is relevant and up-to-date, gives a thorough description of her early life, education, career and achievements. She's clearly very accomplished!
Content evaluation 5/5
editTone and Balance
editThe tone used throughout the article is very neutral. It describes Delia Opekokew and her accomplishments very objectively, there is no bias towards any particular position.
Tone and balance evaluation 5/5
editSources and References
editAll content is backed up and sources accordingly. They are a diverse range of sources and reflect the available literature on the topic. The only thing to be fixed is that the link of the first source cited does not work.
Sources and references evaluation 4.5/5
editOrganization
editThe content is concise and clear. One recommendation could be to perhaps break up the "Career" section into two or more paragraphs, which would make this section easier to read. There are a couple spelling errors such as the spelling of "Indigenous" in the introduction section and the use of "too" instead of "to" in the "Early life and education" section. The sections/headings are broken down appropriately.
Organization evaluation 4/5
editImages and Media
editNo images or media at this time.
Overall impressions
editOverall, this article is very well written and well-sourced. Besides minor fixes, it's a great article. Well done!