User:Laurenbarr88/Ann Cooper Hewitt/Bibliography
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
![]() | Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Bibliography
edit- Suuberg, Alessandra. 2020. Buck v. Bell, American Eugenics, and the Bad Man Test: Putting Limits on Newgenics in the 21st Century: Minnesota Journal of Law and Inequality.
- This is a academic journal published by the Minnesota Journal of Law and Inequality, so it should be a reliable source. It discusses the historical case of Buck v Bell, which upheld the forced sterilization of individuals deemed "unfit" by the state. It also talks about eugenics and reproductive rights in the 21st century.[1]
- Watters, Meaghan. 2012. Eugenic Sterilization in California in the 1920s and 30s: The Human Betterment Foundation’s Study on the Effects of Sterilization.
- This is source is published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It used a collection of documents, official records, and scholarly research to provide insight into California's history and the eugenics movement. [2]
- Peterson, CB. 1936. Ann Cooper Hewitt case.
- This is a collection of images published by the University of California, so it should be a reliable source. These images show who the judge was for Ann Cooper Hewitts case. [3]
Examples:
|
References
edit- ^ Suuberg, Alessandra (2018). "Buck v. Bell, American Eugenics, and the Bad Man Test: Putting Limits on Newgenics in the 21st Century". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3279543. ISSN 1556-5068.
- ^ Watters, Meaghan (April 2, 2012). "Eugenic Sterilization in California in the 1920s and 30s: The Human Betterment Foundation's Study on the Effects of Sterilization" (PDF). Retrieved April 29, 2024.
- ^ Peterson, C. B., ed. (1936). Ann Cooper Hewitt case.
Outline of proposed changes
editThe original Wikipedia article touches on Ann Hewitt and her background decently well. The legacy section of the article is lacking depth so I will be adding to that section. After trying to find more reliable information about Ann Hewitt, there is not many reliable sources to choice from. I will be using the references from above to length and expand on the legacy her case left, in relationship to sterilization.
Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |