User:Lauren2024/Edward L. Deci/Jlc223 Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Lauren2024
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Lauren2024/Edward L. Deci/Bibliography
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Edward L. Deci
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Lead - I think the Lead section in this article contains too much detailed information. I feel like this could be broken up to improve the readability of the article.
Content - The article looks like it only contains information about his professional contributions. It might be nice to add some information about his early/personal life.
Sources and References - I noticed a few statements that were not supported by citations. It could be good to find supporting references to these statements and add them to the article.
Organization - This looks like it could be the biggest opportunity for improvement for this article. Right now all of the information is contained in the Lead section. Breaking this information up into sections would be a great contribution.