User:Larsonrc/Conceptual metaphor

Criticisms

edit

A major criticism of the theory is the way many researchers conduct their research. They studied metaphor in a "top-down" direction, looking first at a few examples to suggest conceptual metaphors, then examining the structure of those metaphors. Researchers would look at their own lexicon, dictionaries, thesauri, and other corpus to study metaphors in language. Critics say this ignored the way language was actually used and focused too much on the hypothetical metaphors, so many irregularities were overlooked in favor of postulating universal conceptual metaphors[1]. In 2007, Pragglejaz Group[2] came up with a methodology for identifying metaphorical expressions as a response to these criticisms.

  1. ^ Kövecses, Zoltán (2008). "Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals". Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 6: 168–184. doi:10.1075/arcl.6.08kov. ISSN 1572-0268.
  2. ^ Group, Pragglejaz (2007-01). "MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse". Metaphor and Symbol. 22 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1080/10926480709336752. ISSN 1092-6488. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)