The contents of the article are relevant to the topic. Not only are the main themes and chapter summaries included in the article, but an unbiased debate on whether the narrative is truth or fiction is included. The article keeps a neutral tone. Although the information about Equiano's truthfulness is included, there is not much depth to it.Kylayvonne (talk) 07:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC) I plan to add more information about the credibility of Equiano. I will make sure to do so in a neutral voice rather than picking a side.Kylayvonne (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC) I am going to begin editing the article by including a brief history of the questioning of Equiano's credibility. I will then add more infomation concerning different opinions.Kylayvonne (talk) 07:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)