ARTICLE EDITING > In general I believe this article was fairly neutral > I think the defintion of "migration" could have been explained better (and definitely explain why migration and immigration are different) > They introduce a concept that we haven't discussed in class, one example being the "Omosis" theory > I'm not entirely sure if the "climate cycles" is relevant. The Author seems to go back and forth between economic and anthropological migration of humans. It probably could be better organized for example 1) Definition of Migration 2) Early Human History of Migration 3) Economic Theories regarding Migration 4) Prominent Theorists 5) etc., > The sources seems to be very reliable and the author has many of them, wether are not they're bias -- of course (But I believe that's true for all research, especially ones that are qualitative) All in all, it's just a smash up of facts regarding migration -- I'm not doubting it's accuracy, however the organization and effectiveness of the piece written is questionable (however I give kudos to anyone who put in time to write a wiki article -- especially when they could be using that time to do something else)
