You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
![]() | Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Bibliography
editEdit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
- Elias, Allison L. (2018-04). ""Outside the Pyramid": Clerical Work, Corporate Affirmative Action, and Working Women's Barriers to Upward Mobility". Journal of Policy History. 30 (2): 301–333. doi:10.1017/S0898030618000106. ISSN 0898-0306[1]
- This is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the 9to5 Movement and its impact in depth, so it is helpful in establishing notability.
- Cobble, Dorothy Sue (1999). ""A Spontaneous Loss of Enthusiasm": Workplace Feminism and the Transformation of Women's Service Jobs in the 1970s". International Labor and Working-Class History (56): 23–44. [2]
- This is a peer reviewed journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the founder of the 9to5 Movement in depth, so it is helpful in establishing notability with the head of the movement.
- Windham, Lane (January 1, 2017). Knocking on Labor’s Door: Union Organizing in the 1970s and the Roots of a New Economic Divide. University of North Carolina Press[3]
- This is a book written by Lane Windham who was a member of the movement. This should be a reliable and useful source as there is a entire chapter around 9to5.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(help)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
Examples:
|
References
editOutline of proposed changes
editClick on the edit button to draft your outline.
Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |