Reflection

Initially, I did not totally trust Wikipedia, and I still don't after having experimented a bit with its controls. It's fairly easy to make an account and does not require much in the way of verification, aside from an email for losing your password. While there are mods, it seems many mods look after a vast amount of pages and keeping everything accurate is not a very easy thing to maintain. While the mods do seem to care about the subject, and most of the time Wikipedia articles seem fairly accurate, I still don't think it should be considered a trustworthy source, especially not usable as a primary source.




Sandbox editing test Test Test

Test Part 3

edit

My SANDBOX [1] Test

Test bold Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).Please update please update please update please update


==Notes==

  1. ^ Dabbraccio, James (Today). {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

I don't know what I'm doing