Adding discussion to your page
User merbabu biased editing
editUser merbabu is making biased edits in Indonesia articles. Just because india is a poverty stricken country that will never develop and will never matter in the world, does not mean that out of jealousy you write rubbish in other countries articles. India has extensive and widepsread use of bullock carts but you have not put any such picture on the Indian front page.
Also note that Indonesia is helping india with tractors http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-02-11/india-business/28543335_1_manufacturing-plant-apollo-tyres-tractors Also note the page on agriculture in India which shows that more than 52% of the country employed in agricultre, lack of modern equipment and irrigation facilities in indian agriculture and constant problems due to dependence on monsoons.
Please add the following picture to the indian main page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Farmer_in_Tamil_Nadu_1993.JPG or for transport http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India.Mumbai.04.jpg
Indonesia is much more modern than a country like india and will continue to modernize unlike india, irrelevant of what you put on a website like wikipedia. I would advise you to change your attitude or like other muslim users on wikipedia have suggested it would be better for us to make our own website for muslim countries as this is just going down the drain with annoying jealous hindu edits in muslim countries articles. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- The problem is that nobody else in the world would allow hindus to come to their lands or give them stuff. Only muslim countries in the past gave them stuff and allowed them to come for work. Now that muslims have backed away and told hindus that they dont want anything to do with them it gives them a shock that now they have nobody in the world. They have an attitude that says that "if you muslims back away then who will help us? we dont have anyone else". So it seems to be an issue that they keep targeting muslim countries articles or keep running after muslim countries because they know nobody else will give them anything. Now that muslims have backed away the hindus seem to have gone mad that there is no one else for them. I guess they understand that nobody else in the world would allow hindus to come to their land or give them stuff. 114.74.197.78 (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- This is an inappropriate use of the article's talk page. The purpose of a talk page is to discuss how best to improve the article, not to hurl accusations at other editors, draw comparisons between different articles or different countries, or make broad accusations of bias that do not pertain to the issues at hand. If you have an issue with a particular editor, take it to his or her own talk page, and please assume good faith. Also, please note that this is a featured article that has been worked on by numerous editors and extensively peer-reviewed, so the changes that are made need to reflect a consensus of editors and need to follow Wikipedia guidelines, which your edits have not. I have yet to hear a reason supporting the changes you are trying to make, and the issues you have raised have nothing to do with the objections that have been stated. Finally, it is the responsibility of no editor but yourself to make the changes that you want to see on Wikipedia. No editor is responsible for the content of any page. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. Feeeshboy (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- This article about Indonesia is not a collaborative effort. This article about Indonesia is owned by user Merbabu. Other users cannot change or fix it. Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.165.14.239 (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Did someone reply? I could not be bothered with this website since its just biased nonsense and give me a break with the "peer reviewed" nonsense. Its not peer reviewed its just reviewed by biased people. You might as well watch fox news because this website is the same as fox news.
Majority of muslims have already moved over to muslim wiki and other websites
http://muslimwiki.com/mw/index.php/MuslimWiki
A more concrete website is also being planned so no more vandalism and no more coming back day after day to remove the vandalism created by others in muslim articles. We have more important things to do than come in everyday to clear away vandalism. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 00:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
I can't believe Merbabu still have problem with Indonesian writers since 3 years ago. Merbabu, we appreciate your contribution for Indonesia, but seriously you have to learn how to deal with your Indonesian peers, especially those who are being critical with your writing. Appreciation should come both ways, my friend. You don't own this page. So many times you behave like one. If you don't change your attitude you will be in trouble all the time here. I mean look at that, 3 years already and you still have problem with Indonesians. People who make progress is the one who is being humble and learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryTrv (talk • contribs) 14:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- I assume that user Merbabu knows NOTHING about Indonesia yet fortunately (or unfortunately?) he writes and creates an article about Indonesia. The provinces... Even he didn't know about the difference between Papua and West Papua, and I needed to fix it years ago. Anyway, I'm bored with this article. Lack of interesting and educative words. It's BIASED, written by people who knows nothing about Indonesia (and how the heaven do they know Indonesian economy?), and even written by NON-INDONESIANS that never travel from Aceh to Papua (just stuck in Java and Bali may be, LOL), never learn about Indonesian native cultures (different each ethnic group), and never have any intention to fix their mistakes. Other articles about Indonesia in Wikipedia in other languages are far BETTER (except for those that just copy this English version). If I knew this earlier, in 2003 I'd write a better article about Indonesia before someone made it (and then he thinks he owns it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.165.14.239 (talk) 00:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)