HowardPlayzOA

Description

This page consist of nothing or few. Please criticize me via my email(s).

About me

I am currently living in Chino Hills;

I am majoring in CyberSec and CompSci for my future projects;

I am going to Mt SAC -> CalPoly Pomona for those majors above;

Contact Information

Email(s)

Has PGP keys

howardplayzoa@gmail.com;

jrantrs@gmail.com;

hpoa.business@gmail.com;

howkertree@icloud.com;

main.hpoa.discord@gmail.com;

No PGP Key(s) Available

itshoward@shenron.su (cannot get through due to Courvix's email server/service technical problems)

Official, but requires time

["hOWARD chen" without capitals and spaces]@2b9t.xyz (This email has PGP key online. You may use it for E2EE.)

End

Any questions, comments, or anything, please contact me via one of those emails above; PGP communication is optional. Thank You.

Extra

My email to Senator Alex, for SB-686

To Sen. Alex:

Hey there, Senetor! 

First of all, I am current in concern of the invasion of privacy about this bill because of there is a lot of private informations that people, including privacy folks, are very well-concerned that this bill will not only block their communications to their families and friends in PRC and South America, but also they have some of their application private keys to communicate other people via voice chats, text chats, etc. Moreover, they also using other privacy focused applications that don't want the government to interfere their daily operations, such as spreading some truthful and honorable informations about their country's oppressions and file exchanges that are not DMCA, that are so important to them where the government shall not interfere with those. As what I am saying is that "When it comes to security, privacy must also think about." Therefore, privacy must be considered as part of security.

Secondly, accessing any private computers, or backdooring, is considered illegal from some bills. Why? That's the law not only to prevent hackers to backdoor everyone's computers, but also including the government to backdoor everyone's private computers via any ports that they are using for. Thus, the people does not want any backdoor access from anyone, especially including your computers.

Lastly, the encryption, AKA cryptography, is the fundamental part of the new era due to rich communications between different networks that aren't blocked by their ISPs; However, since the government want to interfere everyone's daily operations to communicate their friends and families, what I saw is not a good idea to invade everyone's privacy because they have things that have always kept secret all of the times. As a result, this bill will compromise all devices.

In conclusions, people such like me is absolutely and utterly concerned about the bill that will backdoor and invades our privacy, but also to collect some informations that we don't want to send, such as cookies and device certificates. First, not only that, when it comes to security, privacy must be included. Second, governmental backdooring such as private computers is highly illegal because of their OpSec. Third, this bill will compromise all devices, such as private and inaccessible computers, are the most concerning for everyone's daily operations and their OpSec capability. To summarize all, this bill must respect everyone's privacy because it is part of security since 2014.


Sincere,

Howard Chen

2023.03.27

My Letter of Action to Rep. Young Kim and Sen. Alex

Dear Honorable members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, 

I urge you to oppose the Pro Codes Act, H.R. 1631, as many Americans are publishing their own unique contents through any online streaming platforms.

A huge portion of the regulations we all live by (such as fire safety codes, or the national electrical code) are initially written—by industry experts, government officials, and other volunteers—under the auspices of standards development organizations (SDOs). This bill effectively endorses the claim that SDOs can “retain” copyright in codes, even after they are made law, as long as they make the codes available through a “publicly accessible” website – which means read-only, and subject to licensing limits. Congress should not endorse the idea that such companies can set up private tollbooths on the paths that allow everyone to access and review the law. 

Americans have a constitutional right to read, share and discuss the law of the land. SDOs have already lost this battle in court after court, which have recognized that no one can own the law. For these reasons, I urge you to oppose this legislation.

Records from IRCs

IRC4Fun

100% original & 2023年

May 06 19:29:03 <HowardPlayzOfAdmin>	siniStar: Here the source for AR-15 >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15_style_rifle
May 06 19:29:04 <Oracle>	^ An AR-15-style rifle is any lightweight semi-automatic rifle based on or similar to the Colt AR-15 design. The original ArmaLite AR-15, its predecessor, was a scaled-down derivative of Eugene Stoner's ArmaLite AR-10 design and featured selective fire.
May 06 19:29:26 <siniStar>	i disagree with part of the initial statement..
May 06 19:29:40 <siniStar>	07:55:10 PM <+HowardPlayzOfAdmin> Since 1959, AR-15 is used for defense purposes, not killing purposes. What we blame is the mechanisms of the gun to be lower than 6 rounds per second. However, if owning AR-15 without a permit in CA, it would be a crime because it's part of the law. <-- 
May 06 19:29:43 <siniStar>	should be:
May 06 19:30:03 <siniStar>	Since 1959, AR-15 is used for killing purposes, not defense purposes. What we blame is the mechanisms of the gun to be lower than 6 rounds per second. However, if owning AR-15 without a permit in CA, it would be a crime because it's part of the law.

Invitation Codes

Mastodon: https://nerdculture.de/invite/MPF3rkEf