User:Hitrohit2001/Archive6

DipanjanMADPLAYHOUSE The "Mark at Alcoa" exception has never been formalized into policy; it emerged from this discussion. Basically the idea is that someone whose username makes clear that a) they're one individual and b) they have a conflict of interest with regards to one subject shouldn't be blocked for that username. Now, I see this user has been blocked for disruptive editing, so most of this discussion is moot. But regardless of the implications of his name, we don't block him for username purposes until and unless he makes edits that follow through on those implications. "Assume good faith" means we don't block people for what we think they're going to do in that circumstance. We block them for what they actually do. So your "sooner or later" doesn't matter. And, as we've seen, just because we decide against a username block does not in any way preclude a block for other policy violations by the same user. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Orrin Hatch The comment is related to Orrin Hatch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth1seeker (talk • contribs) 20:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC) You should comment on Talk:Orrin Hatch, not on Talk:Orrin hatch. Hitro talk 20:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Robert J Shelby Dear Hitro: Please tell me how I left an "unconstructive edit" that constitutes "vandalism" at Robert J Shelby? In the previous sentence, it says that Hatch and Lee strongly supported his nomination. A sentence illustrating this is included by Lee. I added one by Hatch. How is this vandalism and unconstructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth1seeker (talk • contribs) 21:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I would like to let you know that I didn't revert your edits but an automated bot did, and I have rarely seen this bot doing mistakes. However, this bot may be wrong this time, your edits aren't vandal at all. Please reinstate your edits. Regards. Hitro talk 21:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Hitro: I have reverted the edits. They were not vandalism. Thank you for clarifying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth1seeker (talk • contribs) 21:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC) User name Ah, that's why it appears empty. Thanks for letting me know. Best regards and happy new year ₪Stormmeteo Message 21:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Can you look in to this? There is an article that was created recently that looks more like a promotion/ad for company and is made by a user that bears a company's name. Mammut Industrial Group Delete this message after reading. Thanks. Georgij Michaliutin (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC) It's deleted already. Promotional articles wont survive on Wikipedia. :) Hitro talk 18:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Request from Raymond Deane concerning your persistent and unhelpful interference with his Wikipedia entry Hi - I am Raymond Deane (merriman53@gmail.com). It was NOT I who first inserted the Wikipedia article on me, but I have occasionally attempted to correct changes made to it - most of them highly malicious. I note that you have been making changes to it of late, and that when I have corrected those changes you have undone my corrections. May I request you PLEASE not to do so? I cannot understand why you choose to delete simple biographical information. Thanking you in advance for your cooperation - Sincerely - Dr Raymond Deane Merriman53 (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Merriman53 again re Raymond Deane article Our messages overlapped! I was under the impression that if biographical information came from the actual subject of the article, it would scarcely need any further references to prove its authenticity - perhaps this is naive of me. It does seem strange that when the subject of an article "undoes" something that is unsatisfactory this can be described as "unnecessary use of the undo function". I am also puzzled that in the past highly malicious changes were made to the article by ill-intentioned people but were left in place - yet when I attempt to make a change it is immediately undone. Clarification appreciated. Sincerely - RaymondMerriman53 (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Mr. Deane, Wikipedia tries to maintain neutrality of articles that is why autobiography is strongly discouraged unless the claims made within the article is cited properly with reliable sources. The only reason behind my reversion of your contribution was "unsourced claims" which were unverifiable. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedians do try to remove vandalism as soon as it appears, specially on biographies, I am watching this page now and will try my best to restrict malicious editors to add any kind of defamatory stuffs to this article. Best Regards. Hitro talk 20:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Merriman53 again re Raymond Deane Allodapos - who is working with me - has now undone your changes again - but this time has added a reference to the book by Patrick Zuk that contains all this biographical information. I should point out that the same information is already contained in the website and CMC sources that are referenced in the first two footnotes - this could easily have been confirmed by clicking on those footnotes. I hope this will resolve the issues. We have noted that some of the people who maliciously made earlier changes have actually been subsequently blocked by Wikipedia. This, together with your assurance that you'll keep an eye on such things, is reassuring. Thanks. Merriman53 Merriman53 (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Merriman53 (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Sources will resolve all issues. I'll try to add inline citation to this article for better verifiability. Hitro talk 20:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Merriman53 on resolving issues... Thank you - that's a good improvement. Let's hope the messers stay away... And once again - Allodapos isn't a "vandal", but an associate of mine. Best - Raymond Merriman53 (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Incorrect Info Hi Hitro, I deleted the information because it is incorrect - Derek Ryan has 4 albums. Thanks, Amie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Risingpr (talk • contribs) 14:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Moldova/Moldovan vs Moldavia/Moldavian HitroMilanese, Current correct English name is Moldova and the adjective is of course Moldovan. "Moldavia/Moldavian" was used before 1991 in English language as it was simply transliterated from the Russian "Молдавия" (Moldavia). Before 1991 Moldova was part of Russia/Russian Empire and all provincies carried the Russian names translisterated directly into English. Moldavia/Moldavian is no longer used in English language after the adoption of Moldova/Moldovan names after 1991 (break of Soviet Union and Moldovan Independence). Here is a link for the U.S. Embassy in Moldova showing the correct name Moldova/Moldovan on all pages: http://moldova.usembassy.gov/. Here is a recent NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/nyregion/a-restaurant-in-brooklyn-offers-the-food-and-feeling-of-moldova.html?_r=0. Aerobuz (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Aerobuz Hello, that sounds ok to me. You didn't leave any edit summary thats why I reverted your edits. In future, please use edit summaries as this helps others to understand the intention of your edits. Regards. Hitro talk 17:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Janikowski Hi and thank you, but why do they immediately delete all my edits, even when it's true ? Hello, as per this source, the game took place in the year 2011 not in 2013. I reverted just one edit from you, not all. And please do not forget to sign your post, at the end of your comments simply type four tildes (~), like this: ~~~~. Best Regards. Hitro talk 10:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Ok, sorry, I thought 2011 was about Prater, I read too quickly. Best Regards. Macromega — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macromega (talk • contribs) 10:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks for quick response on Orange Tan Hui Tien Hello, thanks for showing quick response on Orange Tan Hui Tien. I was about to nominate the article for deletion too but with full reason. The user has also posted another similar article Orange Tan which I have nominated for deletion. Please have a look. Cheers. Europa man (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC) You're welcome. About Orange Tan, I dont think this article is unambiguous promotion. WP:A7 may apply here, specifically "db-band".Regards. Hitro talk 11:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Futhead Could you please add the following image to Futhead : http://www.futhead.com/static/img/futhead-logo-white.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdebayoAkinfenwa (talk • contribs) 13:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I am not sure whether this image is copyrighted or not. However, you can use this link to upload images to wikipedia. But before uploading make yourself familiar with Image use policy on Wikipedia. Regards. Hitro talk 13:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion tag Hey dear, just visit talk page of Ninham9 Gary12 you will find list of articles he/she is creating repeatedly which have no sense/no much content at all to identify notability of article. Nechlison (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC) The articles created by this user are short but they are sensible, they credibly claim significance. The content of these articles are short but they definitely identify the subject, we can not tag them with "speedy no context". Please read WP:CCOS too for info about "credible claims of significance". PROD has been removed from all the articles created by "Ninham9 Gary12", and I believe it is a good move. Hitro talk 18:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC) here are some recently created articles of user Ninham9 Gary12 , [1], [2], [3] . I don't know why this user is repeatedly creating topics to same subject without giving any reliable sources, shows no notability, and articles lack significance Nechlison (talk) 18:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Ok I apologize if I made mistake. Thanks Nechlison (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC) There is nothing to apologize. I definitely know that you are here to contribute helpfully to this project. You will learn policies with mistakes, like I did some years ago. :) Discussions help to take good decision and I have noticed that you discuss about every move of yours in Wikipedia. I am seeing a great Wikipedian in you. Cheers. :) Hitro talk 19:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks dude...:-) Nechlison (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC) hi Why are you trying to delete my Calum Hood page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashtonsgirl (talk • contribs) 19:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, WP:BAND and WP:A7, these are the reasons for my nomination of this article for deletion. Regards. Hitro talk 20:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC) hi again he does have importance if his band has a Wikipedia page, look it up its called "5 seconds of summer", so obviously there is importance. I did nothing, please revoke your complaint — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashtonsgirl (talk • contribs) 20:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC) My revocation is not gonna help, Wikipedia is a big place somebody else will nominate it again for deletion. Every article on Wikipedia should pass some basic guidelines of notability such as WP:GNG. Article about a singer or band should pass on WP:BAND. You can make your case on talk page. Hitro talk 20:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Check WP:SPI of Kentatm Hi Hitro, can you please check WP:SPI of this user and also respond to him, he has recently made an article see [4] I think the article with this topic has been previously deleted. Try to respond him. many thanks Nechlison (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC) This is the log page of this article, it has never been deleted before. For Sock-puppetry we need one more username as a puppet or a puppeteer. BTW, this article is not a speedy candidate, it may get delete if you make proper case at AfD. Regards. Hitro talk 20:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Ok thanks. Nechlison (talk) 20:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Sir, who are you? Nechlison? Hitro talk 20:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC) And one more thing, can you please tell me how can I check plagiarism(means copyrighted, copy-paste material) in newly created article while reviewing them ? Nechlison (talk) 20:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC) yes me Nechlison, I forgot to log in. Sorry Nechlison (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC) WP:dupdet helps in comparing two articles. But i trust google or bing more. Just copy a sentence from the article and search it on google, 95 percent times you'll find copyrighted materials instantly. Hitro talk 20:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC) thank yo so much dude. You really helped me alot :) Nechlison (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC) It has been my pleasure. :) Happy Editing. Hitro talk 21:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC) list of improvisational theatre troupes in Canada I just spent a good hour putting together an edit of the list of improv troupes in Canada, but those two lines no longer appear in the page. I didn't remove anything, I'm pretty sure. do my edits still need to get confirmation before they appear? sorry, I forgot to leave a checkin comment. i'll do that next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phorgon (talk • contribs) 21:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I believe it was my mistake, I am sorry for that. Your edits are reinstated. Best Regards. Hitro talk 21:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Hi Hitro Hey Hitro, I have some confusions ? Can you please solve ? Nechlison (talk) 12:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Hi, please tell me. Hitro talk 18:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC) I'm monitoring some of the pages that are tagged for speedy deletion, how can I delet such pages? As I know before deleting any page, what criterias should be considered. Nechlison (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Only admins have rights to delete pages. However, you can read deletion policy here. Hitro talk 18:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC) thanks I'm gonna read it again. But i've tagged some of the pages of blocked users and others that contain pure copyrighted material for speedy deletion and are deleted by other admins. I'm trying my best Nechlison (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC) You are doing good. You'll learn do's and don'ts with your action. :) Happy Editing. Hitro talk 19:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC) But I haven't received good Barnstars yet :( Nechlison (talk) 19:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Hi again Hi hitro, this user see [5] is reverting every edit of other editors and making violations. His page has been tagged for speedy deletion twice and that user is removing tag by him/herself. Nechlison (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC) I've warned him, watching this page now. Hitro talk 19:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks, as this user is new and without giving his reasoning, he has been trying to remove tag again and again. I've tagged that page again for speedy deletion Nechlison (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC) here is an other user making same mistakes and removing tags him/herself from Ricardo Semprun .his page doesn't lie under notability criteria Nechlison (talk) 20:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC) It is not an attack page. It is not disparaging the subject at all. :) I dont think it's a speedy candidate either. Hitro talk 20:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC) I've tagged it(Not for speedy deletion) and have mentioned all problem after reviewing and searching on the subject. 20:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Nechlison (talk) Looks ok to me. Somebody will address these issues someday. :) Hitro talk 20:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Hôpital de Cery I did it on Duplication Detector, I got this result [6] and both the articles are some how similar. But you may be right as you are more experienced than me. I apologize if I'm wrong :( Nechlison (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Copying from Wikipedia is not copyright violation. Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed. Please read WP:Copyright. :) Apart from that, Did you notice the matching phrases in these two articles ? The phrases that are matching are 3 bottom lines that are common in all wikipedia articles. Content of the article isn't similar. Please check it again. :) Hitro talk 21:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Yeah I know that in WP (Texts are available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License). anyone can use them. And yeah I admit both articles are different. Will not repeat that mistake again. biG sorry :) Nechlison (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Change to LM Federal Contractor Misconduct Database: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin The article I modified was reverted and listed as non-sourced, but the source was the same as the original. If you look at the Federal Contractor misconduct database: http://www.contractormisconduct.org/index.cfm?sort=4, (the original source it is sorted by the size of the contractor. Lockheed Martin is listed as number 1 because it is the largest. If you sort on number of incidents, you will find it is third, and for the amount of fines, 21st. No need to re-resource - just sort the page. Please undue your removal of the previous edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EAB1234 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Hi, Thank you for letting me know. Content has been restored. Best Regards. Hitro talk 11:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Please don't delete the page G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion Shortcut: WP:G11 Main page: Wikipedia:Spam Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. "Promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organisation, a point of view, etc. See WP:NOTFORPROMOTION for the policy on this. I don't see how a site about pregnancy with no adds on it that is neutral on all view points, as per your rules as shown above can be breaking these rules. Please don't delete the page. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazy New Life (talk • contribs) 22:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Caption removal Hello, I just found out about the sandbox feature, which I would have used for my page if I knew about it beforehand. I did not know that my article would be published right away. It was now deleted, and the deletion log is visible on the page with captions explaining why it was deleted. Since I made a mistake and did not know about using sandbox (and will be using sandbox from now on) can you please remove the deletion log and deletion caption from the page I was working on? Can the page go back to not existing until my sandbox draft gets approved? Thank you. Va201301 (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Gangsta rap yeah, I consulted my friend on the subject and he said that my edit was correct and that the article did in fact reference the wrong genre the is associated with gangsta rap, thusly I took it upon myself to correct the error. hope you dont mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Der der der der meh meh (talk • contribs) 22:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC) I hope you are referring to this revision, You changed hardcore to hardcrap..right? Please read WP:VAN before contributing more. Hitro talk 22:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC) error on profile hello my name is mohamed coly the one who played in spain and in uk i didnt create this page but some one his using my identity because is note my date of birth im just puttin by the truth to my career http://www.google.fr/imgres?sa=X&espv=210&es_sm=122&biw=1366&bih=667&tbm=isch&tbnid=7kpuuFzRDkrTaM%3A&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.altrinchamfc.co.uk%2Fsquad1011.htm&docid=mHTjcasYVDeFKM&imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.altrinchamfc.co.uk%2Fcoly2.JPG&w=124&h=200&ei=Ow7bUo6uHM2qhQeS9IDICQ&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=1778&page=1&start=0&ndsp=28&ved=0CGkQrQMwBQ this is my photo but its not my date of birth http://www.google.fr/imgres?espv=210&es_sm=122&biw=1366&bih=667&tbm=isch&tbnid=K2IKwsOCbkyNbM%3A&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bdfutbol.com%2Fen%2Fj%2Fj400352.html&docid=uJFS5VJgG_ai4M&itg=1&imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bdfutbol.com%2Fi%2Fj%2F400352.jpg&w=109&h=158&ei=4g7bUvyoDsSthQfywIGQBA&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=458&page=1&start=0&ndsp=20&ved=0CGYQrQMwBA here agaain its my photo but its not my date of birt im born the 13/09/83 in PARIS please can you change that mistake because i had a lot problem with that the people think i was cheating on my age thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djanganavo (talk • contribs) 23:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Hello Mohamed, All material in Wikipedia must be verifiable. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed. Please read WP:V. However, can you provide me with the link of the website where your date of birth is mentioned as 13/09/83. Regards. Hitro talk 12:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Reverted edits on "Advertising" page Hi Hitro, I am confused. I updated three dead links with ones I believed to be the proper destinations (I assume those websites updated the URLs and forgot to create appropriate redirects). Those changes have been reverted. Please let me know what I did wrong. Hi, you introduced references to new websites that confused me a little cuz there were references from reliable sites like nytimes. It could have been my fault, I have reverted my revision now. Happy editing. Hey, you forgot to sign. :p Hitro talk 19:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks, Hitro! Dannywong1190 (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2014 (UTC) speedy delition TO , Hitro Milanese, you have earlier in the month sent a message about the speedy deletion of my article"aakash bali" would like to know the reason for the speedy deletion . WBR, incredible01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Incredible01 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Hello Incredible01, this article was deleted under A7 criteria of speedy deletion,i.e. An article about a real person that fails to indicate why its subject is important or significant. Please read Wikipedia:CCOS for more info about "credible claims of significance". You may recreate this article, there's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article, this guide will give you an idea about what types of articles are accepted on Wikipedia. Best Regards. Hitro talk 16:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Sujit Meher --Fashionburnstar (talk) 10:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC) This page have poorly sourced stuffs in article . Sujit_Meher — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fashionburnstar (talk • contribs) 10:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, if you believe that this article should be deleted speedily then tag it properly with Speedy Deletion tempelate without blanking the page else take it to Article for deletion. Poorly sourced articles are not the subject for speedy deletion. Hitro talk 11:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC) --Fashionburnstar (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Could you add speedy deletion tag as I am new user in Wikipedia This article is not a speedy deletion candidate at all. Please read the List of criteria for speedy deletion. I recommend you to take it to Article for deletion and make your case there. Make sure to read WP:Before before nominating this article for deletion. Regards. Hitro talk 11:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)