Hello,
I believe you reviewed my page submission on "Julian Aguon" and it was declined. This was my first time creating an article so I am not too sure how much more I could fix it because I thought it was done correctly.
Would you be able to assist me in doing the page properly?
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rustybucket2020 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rustybucket2020:, Hello there, I declined this draft on the grounds of inline citation. It appears that you have fixed the draft to much extent. Please remove all the bare/stray URLs or use them as references. Also see WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG for notability guidelines. Hitro talk 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear HitroMilanese, Many thanks indeed for reviewing my page. I only just registered a few days ago and so I need to learn how all of this works.... very confusing for a non-specialist to be honest. I will try and follow your instructions, but I guess may need help. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Microwaves201 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Article D.j. Mirko B.
edit
Le linee guida indicate nel tuo precedente messaggio sono rispettate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Durex223 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Si prega di seguire, per l'accettazione dell'articolo. Hitro talk 06:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Dance Studies Association predecessor organizations
edit
Thank you for reviewing the draft article for Dance Studies Association. Since the article will not be published due to a lack of reliable source coverage, should the Wikipedia articles of the two predecessor organizations, Society of Dance History Scholars and the Congress on Research in Dance also be nominated for deletion? These are the two organizations that merged to form Dance Studies Association. ABT021 (talk) 14:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @ABT021:, Hello there, to be honest, your draft appears to have better sourcing than those two. You may nominate those two for AfD, if you wish. As of your draft, you should work a little on the tone. Regards. Hitro talk 07:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Awaiting review of Draft:Emiway Bantai (indian rapper) since 25 February. I did not want to request you, but due to not being reviewed for several days I had to request. I hope you will approve it. 223.238.194.179 (talk) 07:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- @HitroMilanese, When I spoke to the Administrator (who had protected its main title) concerning the subject, he could not believe that the article had proved to be notable. But he asked the reviewer to wait for the review. I think you should consider something now. Dada Rawan (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
If this article would check immediately it would be better because this article has a big political notability also popular in west Bengal Legislative Assembly Elections 2021. I would add some of his links in other articles so better if it would review immediately. Thanks.TTP1233 (talk) 16:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- I also mentioned to forgot, he is notable in Bengal region mainly. If you google it you will get Anubrata Mandal Short info on info box then reference and source.TTP1233 (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- @TTP1233:, Hello there, thank you for your contribution. I am not sure whether the subject meets WP:NPOL because he has never been elected to any office. I will leave this for somebody who has more experience in Indian politics. Regards. Hitro talk 06:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Why needs WP:NPOL, there are some people who are not qualified WP:NPOL like Biman Bose. Anyways I will accept your advice. Thanks.TTP1233 (talk) 09:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Rubiel Vazquez Draft
edit
Hello,
Thank you for previously reviewing my submission. I made the necessary corrections that you recommended for citations and references. Would you give it another look or let me know if more work is needed?
regards,
B — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianjbecker0707 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjbecker0707: Hello, thank you for your contribution. I will look into this during the weekends. Regards. Hitro talk 14:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for previously reviewing my declined submission. I have not made the necessary corrections that is recommended for citations and references, in regards to this article. I need Help, would you give me more amendments or contributions, much appreciated please let me know, definitely more work and input is urgently needed? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:811C:6901:21AE:FE47:6E73:1FD2 (talk) 10:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, how am I supposed to know the title of the draft that you are talking about? Regards. Hitro talk 14:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, You have reviewed this draft and declined this draft. But I actually couldn't understand the reason of rejection of this draft properly. I have used independent and reliable sources. According to sports notability, A cricket figure is presumed notable if they-
1.Have appeared as a player or umpire in at least one cricket match that is judged by a substantial source to have been played at the highest international or domestic level.
This is one of the conditions for being notable. And it is also mentioned in Notability (Sports) that Youth players (for example, members of under-19 teams) are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. And Shahin Alam is a youth cricketer and he satisfies the first requirements for notability. Which means he had appeared as a player in a cricket match in international level. He appeared in 4 youth international ODIs according to ESPN Cricinfo. And probably he will also appear in any one match of the 5 Unoffical One Day International and 2 Unofficial Twenty 20 International matches against Ireland Wolves in the ongoing series (Ireland Wolves cricket team in Bangladesh in 2020-21) as he is in the squad.
Please can you help me to make me understand the other reasons for rejection. Can you please help me more for this draft. I hope you will reply soon. Thanks A.A Prinon
- @A.A Prinon: Hello there, Please understand the first criteria of inclusion, Have appeared as a player or umpire in at least one cricket match that is judged by a substantial source to have been played at the highest international or domestic level. Under-19s international matches are not considered highest level of international or domestic competition. You should wait for him to appear in at least one domestic match. Cricket notability criteria is one of the most easiest criteria at Wikipedia where a player is deemed notable just for playing one recognized domestic match. Regards. Hitro talk 06:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.A Prinon (talk • contribs) 12:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
My article for Hoth (Band)
edit
I am putting this message on your talk page because i would like to ask you why you rejected my article for the band Hoth. I do not understand why you said that it did not have enough sources, as i put many articles that directly spoke of the band from independent sources. I do not understand why it was rejected. Thank You, Cboi Sandlin (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cboi Sandlin:, Hello there, thank you for your contribution. The drafts about bands must fulfill the criteria listed at WP:BAND for inclusion. I do not see that your draft is meeting any of those criteria. Presented sources are not enough to demonstrate notability per criteria #1 of WP:BAND. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability. Regards. Hitro talk 06:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @HitroMilanese: It said that it is notable if it meets at least one of the criteria. When i look at the first criteria, it says that it must be spoken about in independant sources, of which are reliable and independant of the band. I showed many of those such sources, citing several independent publications in my article. I do not understand why you guys keep on declining my drafts because they do not contain independent sources, when i just cited a whole bunch of independent sources. Cboi Sandlin (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cboi Sandlin: The presented sources may be independent but they are not reliable. Please see WP:RELY. Hitro talk 06:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @HitroMilanese: I fixed it now. I got rid of the unreliable ones and added more reliable ones
OfferMarket should not be flagged for speedy deletion
edit
Thank you for your 14+ years of service to the Wikipedia community. I appreciate you considering my appeal:
The article, OfferMarket, should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...
Full disclosure: I am a co-founder of OfferMarket and we are a fast growing commission-free real estate marketplace. Thousands of people search Google for OfferMarket. I searched Wikipedia for "OfferMarket" and there were no results. There was a prompt: "You may create the page "OfferMarket", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered." It was not, so I created a simple, direct and factual page with a news article citation.
To flag this article for speedy deletion and assert that this information lacks credible claims of importance or significance is deeply troubling to contemplate. Are innovations covered by reputable news organizations that benefit consumers not important? Is entrepreneurship and innovation not important?
Further, moments after this article was flagged for speedy deletion, I received a LinkedIn connection request from a "Page Creation Patrol Officer and Senior Reviewer on the Wiki" asking "Do u want to get Approval for the Company Page on Wikipedia? I provide Page Creation Service with validation by Patrol Reviewer's Network on Wikipedia undergo the WP:Paid Lobbyism Policy. US$1,500 WikiReputation"
I was under the impression Wikipedia was the world's encyclopedia, not an oppressively policed pay-to-play platform. Please suggest how to conform with your standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwshorowitz (talk • contribs) 13:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Dwshorowitz: Hi there, please see WP:NCOMPANY. And also see WP:CCS. This article is correctly nominated for deletion. Unless the topic meets notability guidelines, the chances of survival on mainspace is nil. Wikipedia is definitely the world's encyclopedia but it does not mean that it is like Facebook or MySpace. I suggest you not to entertain any such scammers, this topic is not going to stay for long. Regards. Hitro talk 15:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Prathima Korada Article Help
edit
Hi,
Please help me out and fix the issue of article
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prathima_Korada
Thanks,
Avinash G. Avinash.gorikapudi1 (talk) 20:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Avinash.gorikapudi1:, Hello there, please visit the AfD page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prathima Korada and let us know why this page should not be deleted. I do not think of any way to help you out when the subject itself is not notable. Regards. Hitro talk 06:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Prathima Korada Page
edit
Hi Sir,
Firstly I would like to thank you for your help, But she is the present trending singer and also got so many awards in the area Andrapradesh . Please help me out to improve this article.
Thank You,
Avinash G . Avinash.gorikapudi1 (talk) 06:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Instead of convincing me, it is better to participate in AfD and make your case to keep this article. There is nothing to improve when the topic itself is not meeting the inclusion criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. Thanks. Hitro talk 06:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Draft on Krishan Kumar Chutani
edit
Hello HiltroMilanese.
Thank you for reviewing my page submission on "Krishan Kumar Chutani" which was declined. This was my first time creating an article so I am not too sure how much more I could fix it because I thought it was done correctly.
Would you be able to assist me in doing the page properly?
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suhail here (talk • contribs) 07:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Suhail here:, Hello, please see WP:NPOV. You are required to fix the tone of this draft, use neutral tone without promoting the subject.
With over 20 years’ experience working in the healthcare and foods sectors, Chutani has been part of innovative product developments, empowering initiatives,as well as industry transformations to take holistic Ayurveda healthcare global.
Sentences like these are not suitable for an encyclopedia. Regards. Hitro talk 06:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Can you please check it as he is a Minister of state in a state government of West Bengal.TTP1233 (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks.TTP1233 (talk) 07:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've made the necessary changes in Flintoclass, would really appreciate it, if you could have a look xx
--Moichatterjee (talk) 05:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Moichatterjee: Hello there, I reviewed the draft, I still do not see how the topic is meeting WP:NCOMPANY. Passing mentions, trivial and routine coverage do not constitute significant coverage. Anyhow, I will leave this for another reviewer. Regards. Hitro talk 06:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Sue Dunderdale Draft
edit
Hello there,
Just a quick question. Could you let me know more specifically which parts or part in my draft article are not "verified" by "reliable sources"? You wrote: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources." As a first time user, it would be extremely helpful if you could alert me to a specific section in the article (even one section as an example), so that I can make the relevant changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HH2021 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- @HH2021:, Hello there, thank you for your contribution. The draft that you created is solely based on a single source and that particular source is authored by the subject herself. Such sources are WP:PRIMARY. Please see WP:RS and WP:V to know what sort of sources are accepted at Wikipedia. Regards. Hitro talk 10:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Hitro
Thank you for reviewing my page so quickly. I have gone through the tutorials and hopefully third time lucky for putting in the citations.
kind regards Pam PlhaterrePamphlaterre (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Pamphlaterre:, Hello there, thank you for your contribution. I noticed that you have fixed the referencing style. However, large portion of the draft is still uncourced and not cited at all. Please fix this issue. Regards. Hitro talk 07:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hitro
I've added several external references to the Humanists Australia draft site, including Climate Conversations, The Rationalist Society of Australia, and the National Secular Lobby.
I hope these are sufficient to prove notability.
Humanists Australia is the successor to the Council of Australian Humanist Societies which has a less comprehensive wikipedia entry than the draft Humanists Australia one. I hope this is taken into account.
I had problems formatting the blockquote under "Purposes", with the first dot point showing a literal asterisk instead of a bullet. Do you know how to fix this?
Thanks for your time, I appreciate it.
Warm regards
Magenta-meerkat (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Magenta-meerkat:, Hello there, I see you have updated the references, however, out of 18 references, 14 are WP:PRIMARY. Articles on Wikipedia must be based on reliable third party references. Sources that are affiliated to the subject do not help in demonstrating notability. I suggest you to replace primary sources with third party sources. Notability must be demonstrated for draft acceptance. A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject (WP:ORGCRITE).
- I have fixed the issues in "Purposes" section. I guess the unordered list is being rendered correctly now. Best Regards. Hitro talk 07:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @HitroMilanese: thanks for taking a look and fixing the Purposes issue. Is the problem that the _ratio_ of primary to third party references is too high? Or is it the low number of third party references that is the problem? If the latter, can you give me an idea of how many third party references might be required to prove notability? I don't want to keep wasting your time by resubmitting every time I add another third party reference. Thanks again.
Magenta-meerkat (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @HitroMilanese: I note that the published wikipedia article for Council of Australian Humanist Societies contains only four references, three of which are WP:PRIMARY and one of which is to Humanists International. Of the 18 references on the draft Humanists Australia page, 6 are to the Humanists Australia website, 3 are to Human Union, 2 are to Australian Government sites, 3 are to Humanists International, 3 are to allied organisations, and 1 is to a podcast.
Magenta-meerkat (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Magenta-meerkat:, Hello there, I'll be replying to both of your messages together here. The problem is neither ratio nor the quantity of the third party reference. All the claims made within the draft should be verifiable with the third party reliable references & primary sources should be avoided. You may use just 4 or 5 third party references and remove self published or primary sources from the draft. In order to establish notability, you are required to demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage in multiple reliable third party sources.
- Secondly, please see WP:OTHER. There are many articles on Wikipedia that should not exist on mainspace or are not of the best of the qualities. They are there because an experienced user never reviewed it closely. Acceptance or rejection of the drafts are not based on existence or deletion of other material on Wikipedia. Every draft is analysed individually based on existing policies. I have tagged the said article with required maintenance templates. Best Regards, Hitro talk 07:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Dr. Michael J. Lenardo, M.D.
edit
Dear Hitro,
I wanted to check with you to learn how much longer the review for this article could take. It has been around 4 months since submission but looks like there are many articles in the queue.
Thank you again for your assistance with this project.
Best,
Heather — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hecamo (talk • contribs) 21:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Hecamo: Dear Heather,
- I expect the draft to be reviewed within 2 weeks from now. The current waiting time is 4 months and your draft is almost there. I do not have expertise in genetics and medicine else I would have reviewed it. Regards. Hitro talk 10:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Hitro: Dear Hitro,
- Thanks, I will look out for it. Regards, Hecamo (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)HeCamo
- @Hitro: Dear Hitro,
- The draft is still statused as pending. Do you have any recommendations for subject experts in genetics and medicine that I could reach out to? Or will it be better to wait? Appreciate all your help with this. Regards, Hecamo (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)HeCamo
Request on 13:00:49, 7 April 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by PaoloDg71
edit
PaoloDg71 (talk) 13:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @PaoloDg71: Hello there, please elaborate your question. You may want to see WP:NWEB for the reason of my declining your draft. Regards. Hitro talk 05:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your help.
Hey HitroMilanese,
I just want to bring to your notice the draft:Ayra Starr which has been improved recently. Added reliable sources to the article. Could you please look at it again. Preye douglas (talk) 10:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Preye douglas:, Hello there, thank you for your contribution. Presented sources are reliable. I guess she is meeting WP:GNG. I'll do some google searches and review this draft shortly. Regards. Hitro talk 05:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Anuj Arora Biography
edit
Sir i have provided more reference for article declined by your goodself on lack of reference .Please help me as well I'm new to community
- @Winnergreat:, Hello there, first of all please make sure to sign your comments otherwise you won't receive responses. Secondly, please see WP:REFB and fix the citation style of your draft. Also remove the external links from the body of the draft. Above all, please see WP:GNG and demonstrate notability accordingly. Unless notability is demonstrated, the draft won't be accepted. Regards. Hitro talk 07:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Please I have made citation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winnergreat (talk • contribs) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Draft:Aron Wiesenfeld
edit
Hello Hitro,
Thank you for reviewing the draft and leaving your feedback. I have rewritten the draft as per your suggestions. Please review the draft here. I have tried to be as neutral as possible. I've removed all the unreliable sources and left only reputable ones. Instead of wasting your valuable time, I request you to give a glance to the draft and let me know whether it worths submitting. Thanks in advance.~~
- @Aron Wiesenfeld: Hello there, First of all, please sign your comments properly. Unsigned posts may not receive response. Secondly, the subject seems to be notable and the draft appears properly referenced but you have a strong COI which keeps me from accepting this draft. However, I will review each and every source by mid-week and review it. In the meantime, you may move your COI declaration from the draft space to your user page and update the existing draft with the sandbox content. Regards. Hitro talk 09:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Hitro: Hello Hitro, I have updated the draft as you instructed and moved the COI declaration to my user page. I hope you will get time to review it. Stay safe. Best. Aron Wiesenfeld (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Aron Wiesenfeld:, Hello there, I am having some health related issues, I will look into this later this week. Regards. Hitro talk 07:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
I have created a draft which is not accepted. What should I do?
Hello,
Thank you for reviewing the draft article for Medianova. Could you tell me what I am doing wrong exactly? This was my first contribution and I'm not sure which of my sources are not suitable. I'm looking forward to your feedbacks.
Thank you.
- @SaygKayc:, Hello there, For establishing notability you are required to introduce multiple references where the topic has received significant coverage. Passing mentions, press releases and routine coverage are not enough. Apart from that, those references must be from reputable and independent sources. Please see WP:RS and WP:GNG. None of the sources that you presented satisfy the inclusion criteria of WP:GNG. Regards. Hitro talk 07:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft: EssentiallySports
edit
Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my draft. I am trying to understand the cause of rejection, notability, and credible references, the website has a decent Alexa ranking which I have referenced to. Moreover, I checked and EssentiallySports has more than 6000 mentions on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=EssentiallySports&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1&ns0=1), which proves that the company is notable. Please let me know if there are any specific suggestions you have on the same.
Thank you again.
- @Hpjastes1995:, Hello there, in order to demonstrate notability you must introduce multiple references where this website has received significant coverage. Trivial info, passing mentions, press releases and routine coverage are not enough. Please see WP:RS and WP:NWEB. Most of the sources that you included do not meet the inclusion criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NWEB. Regards. Hitro talk 07:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Request on 06:47:25, 4 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by NinaSeitle
edit
Hello, thank you for reading my draft. I need a little bit help. The draft should only be a translation for a german wikipedia article called "Neuburger Kieselerde" https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuburger_Kieselerde. We have had the article translated by a native speaker. Can you help me put this article online?
NinaSeitle (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- @NinaSeitle:, Hello there, in order to get this draft accepted at Wikipedia, you are required to add references. All material in English Wikipedia, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. Please see WP:V and WP:RS and add references accordingly. You may also want to see WP:REFB to get yourself familiar with referencing technique. Regards. Hitro talk 09:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Regarding Triveni Group Draft
edit
Hello there mate,
I believe you reviewed my page submission on "Triveni Group" and it was declined. This is my first time creating an article on Wikipedia
Would you be able to point out the list of what should I be working on to get my article get approved?
Thanks a lot.
Cheers!!
- @Sunilwikishrestha:, Hello there, please see WP:NCOMPANY and WP:CORPDEPTH and introduce the sources in your draft accordingly. In order to get your draft accepted, you are required to demonstrate notability as per the guidelines. Please see WP:RS to know what sort of references are acceptable. Regards. Hitro talk 09:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sir. I am writing on behalf of Malki Means King. I am his manager. We are wondering why his submission was considered "not notable" when winning a nationwide contest should technically qualify for a Wikipedia page. The Hot 97 contest was a major accomplishment, and they are actually the #1 urban hip hop / rnb radio station in the United States (you can look that up). Other accomplishments are notable like being the creator of the "diamond tester challenge" and having millions of followers on Tik Tok. With the articles written about him, I am not sure why it didn't pass? Let me know thanks, KC.
- Hello there, firstly, you should see WP:DCOI and stipulate your connection to the subject of the draft. Wikipedia has strict guidelines related to conflict of interest. Secondly, please indicate which criteria of WP:MUSICBIO you think that the artist meets. At present, the listed references are not reliable enough to establish notability. Regards. Hitro talk 05:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft: Vera Mityagina
edit
Hello, thank you for reviewing my draft! I fixed the issue with citations and cleaned up the page. Is there anything else I need to do to ensure it can be published?
Jackg2718 (talk) 16:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Jackg2718:, Hello there, thank you for your contribution.
- The sections "Soviet Airships" and "USSR-V1" are unnecessarily long with very little relevance to the topic. These sections should be merged with other sections or outright removed. Some references, such as the research paper from Kulikowski, are discussing about the airship without mentioning the subject, I don't understand the relevance of including such sources. I suggest, instead of elongating the draft by discussing irrelevant topic, you should trim the draft and stick to the discussion related to the subject. The quality of the draft and referencing is more important than the length of the draft. Regards. Hitro talk 06:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- @HitroMilanese: Hello,
- I removed the Soviet Airship section and merged the USSR V1 section with "Airship Pilot" to provide information about the airship the subject flew. Thank you for your help.
Jackg2718 (talk) 00:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi I am writing to have you verify my music videos go to
Homero singer at www.youtube.com -Homero @homerovela3 twitter also Cashbox magazine November 2, 1996 page 18 The latin lowdown
Thank you Homero
Hi to whom this may concern wanted to add you can verify me through my articles in Cashbox magazine on November 2 1996 page 18
it has alot of what I have written in my Bio. Also go to homero singer on www.youtube.com you can see my music videos as well.
Thank you Homero
- Hello there, I am not able to find the draft. It appears you have not created it. Please provide me with the link to the draft. Regards. Hitro talk 06:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi I am writing to give you the link to my cashbox article, worldradiohistory.com cashboxmagazinemusicandcoinmagazine 1942 to nov 1996.
The issue I am in is November 2, 1996 vol. lx no7
other links Homero singer at www.youtube.com
Homero @homerovela3 twitter
Thank you for your time,
also can someone write my Bio what is the fee?
Thank you
Homero — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magicdream29 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Magicdream29: Hello there, Wikipedia is a community developed encyclopedia where editors contribute voluntarily. Paid editing is strongly discouraged. Please see WP:COI and disclose your association with the subject before proceeding any further with draft creation. Regards. Hitro talk 07:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)