User:HelloWorld194/Nazi racial theories/H2lam Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
HelloWorld194
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:HelloWorld194/Nazi racial theories
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Nazi racial theories
Evaluate the drafted changes
editLead: The lead has been updated to reflect proposed changes to the article and introduces the article's topics. However, I'd suggest the lead information be placed under the bolded "Lead" title at the end so that it's easier to see.
Content: Content is relevant to the topic. Might be a good idea to show where it will be placed in the article.
Tone and Balance: Content added is neutral.
Sources and References: Sources are not backed by a reliable source. The source linked is a Wikipedia article.
Organization: The content is easy to understand and written well without spelling errors.
Images and Media: Not applicable, no images were added.
Overall Impressions: The content does improve the original article. I would suggest some improvements on how the proposed changes are displayed on the user's sandbox and to cite from a secondary source, such as a peer reviewed article.