User:Harry Princeton/Chain Integrals and Higher-Order Integrals

This is my work on Chain Integration and Integration by Parts (higher-order integrals). Also included is a differential analysis on cycloids.

Chain Integration Formula and Examples edit

See Fresnel integral.

We could approximate the tangent and secant integrals

  and  

by using the Cauchy Principal Value and integration by parts:

  and  

with the square Chain Integration formula   where  .

In fact, integrals through CPV are defined when subtracting balanced pole functions - pure powers of   - from original poles, results in functions with remaining possible singularities of size   with   strict).

Notice that both   and   have simple nonzero isolated poles, limiting to scalar multiples of  . Then   and  with  .

Therefore,   is bounded for   and  ; as we have the related bounded integral  and we can do scalar multiple comparisons. So by CPV, the above integrals are defined except at isolated poles. Graphs of these integrals for   are found below:

Graphs of   and  
Integral of Tan x^2 Integral of Sec x^2
   
[0,15] × [-5, 5] [0,15] × [-5, 5]

Finally, we have, approximately:

 

 

compared to   for both   and  .

Modulated Integrals edit

We could also approximate the cotangent and cosecant integrals

  and  

by using an integration by parts, but need to isolate a pole of order 2 at   for each function. We do so by subtracting   from each function to yield bounded functions   at   (in fact, with   for both functions!), applying the same treatment   as previously (it works similarly at all other poles), and then adding the antiderivative   of   back.

Since both integrals have right limit   as   approaches  , we instead add constants so that critical points/inflection points of the cotangent/cosecant integrals, respectively, approach   as   (canonicalization). We thus have:

 

 

With graphs seen below:

Graphs of   and  
Integral of Cot x^2 Integral of csc x^2
   
[0,15] × [-5, 5] [0,15] × [-5, 5]

Higher Order (Stacked) Integrals edit

A general formula for the second-order real integral (second antiderivative) is

 

A general formula for the third-order real integral (third antiderivative) is

 

A general formula for the  th-order real integral ( th antiderivative) is

 

So to compute higher-order integrals, no other nonelementary integrals need to be considered except for those possibly equal to   for   (Riemann-integrable functions). To compute from another bound  , it is sufficient for integrals only of the form   to be considered.

Example edit

Below, the first five antiderivatives of   are computed and graphed, using this method. Since   is undefined at   (in fact,   is an essential singularity, and every antiderivative diverges as  ), we start at   instead (a critical minimum point for  , so most suitable):

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Note that the general chain integral formula cannot be used since (1)   is not strictly monotone, (2) no balanced essential singularity can be isolated from  , not even  , and (3) even the balanced essential singularity   is not elementary-integrable.

Graphs of Five Antiderivatives of  
Square Window Vertical Rectangular Window
   
[-9,9] × [-3.478, 10.432] [-3.3,3.3] × [-50, 50]

Cycloid edit

The work-energy formula is intrinsic to any twice continuously differentiable increasing function:

 

This is by Chain Rule, since   for any twice continuously differentiable increasing function  .

Using the work-energy formula

 

with  , initial position  , and initial velocity  ; we have

 

by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus I. So in fact the cycloid is the solution   to Newton's Gravitational Law (where time is measured in  ) if a particle is bounded in a heavy point object's gravitational field (negative net energy), with zero angular momentum; if we set  ,  , to obtain  .

Other zero-angular-momentum solutions for identical mass include   for zero net energy, and   for positive net energy. For the first case, indeed

 

by the Power Rule, where the additional constant of   is specific to the cycloid only (which is the total energy); and for the second case, indeed

 

 

by the parametric derivative, and the additional constant of   is specific to this second path only (which is the total energy).