GA review

edit

Last updated: 19:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC) by FenrisAureus

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

edit
  1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
  1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research

edit
  2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
  2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
  2c) it contains no original research
  2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage

edit
  3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
  3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

edit
  4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

edit
  5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

edit
  6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
  6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall:  

edit

Comments:

edit